Farming Simulator 2020 Crack + Keygen Code Free Download 2020

Principles Of Economics Mankiw 6th Edition Solutions Pdf. Container prinealtragoc/farming-simulator-2015-crack-multiplayer-bernsabr. By prinealtragoc. crackpropc.com › page. Wikipedia is a free content, multilingual online encyclopedia written and maintained by a On January 23, 2020, the English-language Wikipedia, which is the largest.

watch the video

Farming Simulator 19 Serial Key Code / license keys Sword of the Necromancer ACTIVATION.Sword of the Necromancer serial key generator. Corporate Bullshit Generator The Corporate Bullshit Generator is a best-in-class, high-performance random text generator that is The program's installer files are commonly found as SKGenerator.exe or Serial Key Generator.exe etc. Disjunction license key without survey.download license key for Disjunction pc. Age of Wonders: Planetfall. Tiny Cars 2 v1.05 and v1.1 PC Game: 22. It was release in Sep 2015. Wolfenstein: Youngblood license key without survey.download license key for Wolfenstein: Youngblood pc. The most popular versions of the tool are 7.0, 6.0 and 5.1. KeyGen Software License Key Generator allows you to add keyed licenses to your program in order to get benefits from it. Encodya Keygen Generator Online Activation License. Little Nightmares 2 license key.txt free download. WWE 2K18 Key Generator — Activation Code By MegaKeys — February 8, 2018 Posted in: Activation Code, Console, Key Generator, PC WWE 2K18 Key Generator — Activation Code Hi at our new article. Encodya. With Games Key Check out The Sims 4 Serial Key Generator that can generate lots of key codes for The Sims 4 game for PC. Project CARS 3 license key. PES 2017 Serial Key Generator that was made for all stages : PC (Windows XP,7,8.1 and Linux as well), PS3, PS3, Xbox 360 and Xbox ONE. Game Product Key Finder retrieves serial keys from local machine or network computers and allows protecting your company from having pirated game software on your network. Gods Will Fall license key. Best Games Like LEGO Star Wars Best Games Like Roblox Best Games Like Already the download number tells Please submit your review for CD Key Generator. Breed PC-Game: 24. Persona 5 Strikers license key without survey.download license key for Persona 5 Strikers pc. Little Nightmares 2 license key without survey.download license key for Little Nightmares 2 pc. Our database currently contains 500.000 different games for different platforms like PC Windows, PlayStation and Xbox ONE. Game Serial Key Generator free download - CD Key Generator, Serial Key Maker, Wireless Key Generator, and many more programs The program's installer files are commonly found as SKGenerator.exe or Serial Key Generator.exe etc. Werewolf The Apocalypse Earthblood Keygen Generator Online Activation License. The sequence of numbers/digits can be defined in the application. Our antivirus scan shows that this download is malware free. We adding new games and keys almost every day so every player has a chance to get some multiplayer games for totally free.With our technique, you will have a game … Our antivirus scan shows that this download is malware free. Wolfenstein: Youngblood. Serial Key Generator is a program to help developers generate serial numbers for applications. FIFA 19 CD Key + Serial Key Generator for PC + XBOX + Windows. Little Nightmares 2. You should not wait for whatever, just acquire this key generator and grab permission to access game at no cost. Generate large amounts of unique serial numbers and use them to protect your software. Gods Will Fall Activation Serial License Numbers / Key-Generator.Gods Will Fall Crack & Serial Key With Keygen Download.Gods Will Fall license key download Gods Will Fall activation key.Gods Will Fall Serial Key, Cd Key, Keygen, Product Code.How to get Gods Will Fall CD Key Serial.Gods Will Fall – Activation Keys Giveaway.Gods Will Fall Serial Key/Cd Key/Key/Game Keys.Gods Will Fall Steam CD Key – Instant Delivery.Download Gods Will Fall Full Version Key.Gods Will Fall license key.txtHow to get Gods Will Fall KEY Gods Will Fall [PS4/XBOX, PC-Origin, Nintendo] …Download Gods Will Fall For Windows PC Serial Key

Wikipedia

Multilingual free online encyclopedia

This article is about Wikipedia. For Wikipedia's home page, see Main Page. For the English edition, see English Wikipedia. For a list of Wikipedias in other languages, see List of Wikipedias. For other uses, see Wikipedia (disambiguation).

Wikipedia (wik-ih-PEE-dee-ə or wik-ee-) is a free content, multilingual online encyclopedia written and maintained by a community of volunteers through a model of open collaboration, using a wiki-based editing system. Individual contributors, also called editors, are known as Wikipedians. It is the largest and most-read reference work in history,[3] and consistently one of the 15 most popular websites ranked by Alexa; as of 2021,[update] Wikipedia was ranked the 13th most popular site.[3][4] A visitor spends an average time on Wikipedia of 3 minutes and 45 seconds each day.[5] It is hosted by the Wikimedia Foundation, an American non-profit organization funded mainly through small donations.[6]

Wikipedia was launched on January 15, 2001, by Jimmy Wales[7] and Larry Sanger; Sanger coined its name as a blending of "wiki" and "encyclopedia".[8] Initially available only in English, versions in other languages were quickly developed. Its combined editions comprise more than 57 million articles, attracting around 2 billion unique device visits per month, and more than 17 million edits per month (1.9 edits per second).[10][11] In 2006, Time magazine stated that the policy of allowing anyone to edit had made Wikipedia the "biggest (and perhaps best) encyclopedia in the world", and is "a testament to the vision of one man, Jimmy Wales".[12]

Wikipedia has received praise for its enablement of the democratization of knowledge, extent of coverage, unique structure, culture, and reduced amount of commercial bias, but criticism for exhibiting systemic bias, particularly gender bias against women and alleged ideological bias.[13][14]Its reliability was frequently criticized in the 2000s, but has improved over time and has been generally praised in the late 2010s and early 2020s.[3][13][15] Its coverage of controversial topics such as American politics and major events such as the COVID-19 pandemic has received substantial media attention. It has been censored by world governments, ranging from specific pages to the entire site. It has become an element of popular culture, with references in books, films and academic studies. In 2018, Facebook and YouTube announced that they would help users detect fake news by suggesting fact-checking links to related Wikipedia articles.[16][17]

History

Main article: History of Wikipedia

Nupedia

Main article: Nupedia

Logo reading "Nupedia.com the free encyclopedia" in blue with the large initial "N"
Wikipedia originally developed from another encyclopedia project called Nupedia.

Other collaborative online encyclopedias were attempted before Wikipedia, but none were as successful.[18] Wikipedia began as a complementary project for Nupedia, a free online English-language encyclopedia project whose articles were written by experts and reviewed under a formal process.[19] It was founded on March 9, 2000, under the ownership of Bomis, a web portal company. Its main figures were Bomis CEO Jimmy Wales and Larry Sanger, editor-in-chief for Nupedia and later Wikipedia.[1][20] Nupedia was initially licensed under its own Nupedia Open Content License, but even before Wikipedia was founded, Nupedia switched to the GNU Free Documentation License at the urging of Richard Stallman.[21] Wales is credited with defining the goal of making a publicly editable encyclopedia,[22][23] while Sanger is credited with the strategy of using a wiki to reach that goal.[24] On January 10, 2001, Sanger proposed on the Nupedia mailing list to create a wiki as a "feeder" project for Nupedia.[25]

Launch and early growth

The domainswikipedia.com (later redirecting to wikipedia.org) and wikipedia.org were registered on January 12, 2001,[26] and January 13, 2001,[27] respectively, and Wikipedia was launched on January 15, 2001[19] as a single English-language edition at www.wikipedia.com,[28] and announced by Sanger on the Nupedia mailing list.[22] Its policy of "neutral point-of-view"[29] was codified in its first few months. Otherwise, there were initially relatively few rules, and it operated independently of Nupedia.[22] Bomis originally intended it as a business for profit.[30]

The Wikipedia home page on December 20, 2001

English Wikipedia editors with >100 edits per month[31]

Wikipedia gained early contributors from Nupedia, Slashdot postings, and web search engine indexing. Language editions were also created, with a total of 161 by the end of 2004.[33] Nupedia and Wikipedia coexisted until the former's servers were taken down permanently in 2003, and its text was incorporated into Wikipedia. The English Wikipedia passed the mark of two million articles on September 9, 2007, making it the largest encyclopedia ever assembled, surpassing the Yongle Encyclopedia made during the Ming Dynasty in 1408, which had held the record for almost 600 years.[34]

Citing fears of commercial advertising and lack of control, users of the Spanish Wikipediaforked from Wikipedia to create Enciclopedia Libre in February 2002.[35] Wales then announced that Wikipedia would not display advertisements, and changed Wikipedia's domain from wikipedia.com to wikipedia.org.[36][37]

Though the English Wikipedia reached three million articles in August 2009, the growth of the edition, in terms of the numbers of new articles and of editors, appears to have peaked around early 2007.[38] Around 1,800 articles were added daily to the encyclopedia in 2006; by 2013 that average was roughly 800.[39] A team at the Palo Alto Research Center attributed this slowing of growth to the project's increasing exclusivity and resistance to change.[40] Others suggest that the growth is flattening naturally because articles that could be called "low-hanging fruit"—topics that clearly merit an article—have already been created and built up extensively.[41][42][43]

In November 2009, a researcher at the Rey Juan Carlos University in Madrid found that the English Wikipedia had lost 49,000 editors during Farming Simulator 2020 Crack + Keygen Code Free Download 2020 first three months of 2009; in comparison, it lost only 4,900 editors during the same period in 2008.[44][45]The Wall Street Journal cited the array of rules applied to editing and disputes related to such content among the reasons for this trend.[46] Wales disputed these claims in 2009, denying the decline and questioning the study's methodology.[47] Two years later, in 2011, he acknowledged a slight decline, noting a decrease from "a little more than 36,000 writers" in June 2010 to 35,800 in June 2011. In the same interview, he also claimed the number of editors was "stable and sustainable".[48] A 2013 MIT Technology Review article, "The Decline of Wikipedia", questioned this claim, revealing that since 2007, Wikipedia had lost a third of its volunteer editors, and that those remaining had focused increasingly on minutiae.[49] In July 2012, The Atlantic reported that the number of administrators was also in decline.[50] In the November 25, 2013, issue of New York magazine, Katherine Ward stated, "Wikipedia, the sixth-most-used website, is facing an internal crisis."[51]

Milestones

Cartogramshowing number of articles in each European language as of January 2019.[update]One square represents 10,000 articles. Languages with fewer than 10,000 articles are represented by one square. Languages are grouped by language family and each language family is presented by a separate color.

In January 2007, Wikipedia first became one of the ten most popular websites in the US, according to comscore Networks. With 42.9 million unique visitors, it was ranked #9, surpassing The New York Times (#10) and Apple (#11). This marked a significant increase over January 2006, when Wikipedia ranked 33rd, with around 18.3 million unique visitors.[52] As of March 2020[update], it ranked 13th[4] in popularity according to Alexa Internet. In 2014, it received eight billion page views every month.[53] On February 9, 2014, The New York Times reported that Wikipedia had 18 billion page views and nearly 500 million unique visitors a month, "according to the ratings firm comScore".[10] Loveland and Reagle argue that, in process, Wikipedia follows a long tradition of historical encyclopedias that have accumulated improvements piecemeal through "stigmergic accumulation".[54][55]

On January 18, 2012, the English Wikipedia participated in a series of coordinated protests against two proposed laws in the United States Congress—the Stop Online Piracy Act (SOPA) and the PROTECT IP Act (PIPA)—by blacking out its pages for 24 hours.[56] More than 162 million people viewed the blackout explanation page that temporarily replaced its content.[57][58]

On January 20, 2014, Subodh Varma reporting for The Economic Times indicated that not only had Wikipedia's growth stalled, it "had lost nearly ten percent of its page views last year. There was a decline of about two billion between December 2012 and December 2013. Its most popular versions are leading the slide: page-views of the English Wikipedia declined by twelve percent, those of German version slid by 17 percent and the Japanese version lost nine percent."[59] Varma added, "While Wikipedia's managers think that this could be due to errors in counting, other experts feel that Google's Knowledge Graphs project launched last year may be gobbling up Wikipedia users."[59] When contacted on this matter, Clay Shirky, associate professor at New York University and fellow at Harvard's Berkman Klein Center for Internet & Society said that he suspected much of the page-view decline was due to Knowledge Graphs, stating, "If you can get your question answered from the search page, you don't need to click [any further]."[59] By the end of December 2016, Wikipedia was ranked the 5th most popular website globally.[60]

In January 2013, 274301 Wikipedia, an asteroid, was named after Wikipedia; in October 2014, Wikipedia was honored with the Wikipedia Monument; and, in July 2015, 106 of the 7,473 700-page volumes of Wikipedia became available as Print Wikipedia. In April 2019, an Israeli lunar lander, Beresheet, crash landed on the surface of the Moon carrying a copy of nearly all of the English Wikipedia engraved on thin nickel plates; experts say the plates likely survived the crash.[61][62] In June 2019, scientists reported that all 16 GB of article text from the English Wikipedia had been encoded into synthetic DNA.[63]

Current state

On January 23, 2020, the English-language Wikipedia, which is the largest language section of the online encyclopedia, published its six millionth article.

By February 2020, Wikipedia ranked eleventh in the world in terms of Internet traffic.[64] As a key resource for disseminating information related to COVID-19, the World Health Organization has partnered with Wikipedia to help combat the spread of misinformation.[65][66]

Wikipedia accepts cryptocurrency donations and Basic Attention Token.[67][68][69]

Openness

Differences between versions of an article are highlighted

Unlike traditional encyclopedias, Wikipedia follows the procrastination principle[note 3] regarding the security of its content.[70]

Restrictions

Due to Wikipedia's increasing popularity, some editions, including the English version, have introduced editing restrictions for certain cases. For instance, on the English Wikipedia and some other language editions, only registered users may create a new article.[71] On the English Wikipedia, among others, particularly controversial, sensitive or vandalism-prone pages have been protected to varying degrees.[72][73] A frequently vandalized article can be "semi-protected" or "extended confirmed protected", meaning that only "autoconfirmed" or "extended confirmed" editors can modify it.[74] A particularly contentious article may be locked so that only administrators can make changes.[75] A 2021 article in the Columbia Journalism Review identified Wikipedia's page-protection policies as "[p]erhaps the most important" means at its disposal to "regulate its market of ideas".[76]

In certain cases, all editors are allowed to submit modifications, but review is required for some editors, depending on certain conditions. For example, the German Wikipedia maintains "stable versions" of articles[77] which have passed certain reviews. Following protracted trials and community discussion, the English Wikipedia introduced the "pending changes" system in December 2012. Under this system, new and unregistered users' edits to certain controversial or vandalism-prone articles are reviewed by established users before they are published.[79]

Wikipedia's editing interface

Review of changes

Although changes are not systematically reviewed, the software that powers Wikipedia provides tools allowing anyone to review changes made by others. Each article's History page links to each revision.[note 4][80] On most articles, anyone can undo others' changes by clicking a link on the article's History page. Anyone can view the latest changes to articles, and anyone registered may maintain a "watchlist" of articles that interest them so they can be notified of changes. "New pages patrol" is a process where newly created articles are checked for obvious problems.[81]

In 2003, economics Ph.D. student Andrea Ciffolilli argued that the low transaction costs of participating in a wiki created a catalyst for collaborative development, and that features such as allowing easy access to past versions of a page favored "creative construction" over "creative destruction".[82]

Vandalism

Main article: Vandalism on Wikipedia

Any change or edit that manipulates content in a way that purposefully compromises Wikipedia's integrity is considered vandalism. The most common and obvious types of vandalism include additions of obscenities and crude humor; it can also include advertising and other types of spam.[83] Sometimes editors commit vandalism by removing content or entirely blanking a given page. Less common types of vandalism, such as the deliberate addition of plausible but false information, can be more difficult to detect. Vandals can introduce irrelevant formatting, modify page semantics such as the page's title or categorization, manipulate the article's underlying code, or use images disruptively.[84]

Obvious vandalism is generally easy to remove from Wikipedia articles; the median time to detect and fix Farming Simulator 2020 Crack + Keygen Code Free Download 2020 is a few minutes.[85][86] However, some vandalism takes much longer to detect and repair.[87]

In the Seigenthaler biography incident, an anonymous editor introduced false information into the biography of American political figure John Seigenthaler in May 2005, falsely presenting him as a suspect in the assassination of John F. Kennedy.[87] It remained uncorrected for four months.[87] Seigenthaler, the founding editorial director of USA Today and founder of the Freedom ForumFirst Amendment Center at Vanderbilt University, called Wikipedia co-founder Jimmy Wales and asked whether he had any way of knowing who contributed the misinformation. Wales said he did not, although the perpetrator was eventually traced.[88][89] After the incident, Seigenthaler described Wikipedia as "a flawed and irresponsible research tool".[87] The incident led to policy changes at Wikipedia for tightening up the verifiability of biographical articles of living people.[90]

In 2010, Daniel Tosh encouraged viewers of his show, Tosh.0, to visit the show's Wikipedia article and edit it at will. On a later episode, he commented on the edits to the article, most of them offensive, which had been made by the audience and had prompted the article to be locked from editing.[91][92]

Edit warring

Wikipedians often have disputes regarding content, which may result in repeated competing changes to an article, known as "edit warring".[93][94] It is widely seen as a resource-consuming scenario where no useful knowledge is added,[95] and criticized as creating a competitive[96] and conflict-based[97] editing culture associated with traditional masculine gender roles.[98]

Policies and laws

Content in Wikipedia is subject to the laws (in particular, copyright laws) of the United States and of the US state of Virginia, where the majority of Wikipedia's servers are located. Beyond legal matters, the editorial principles of Wikipedia are embodied in the "five pillars" and in numerous policies and guidelines intended to appropriately shape content. Even these rules are stored in wiki form, and Wikipedia editors write and revise the website's policies and guidelines.[99] Editors can enforce these rules by deleting or modifying non-compliant material. Originally, rules on the non-English editions of Wikipedia were based on a translation of the rules for the English Wikipedia. They have since diverged to some extent.[77]

Content policies and guidelines

According to the rules on the English Wikipedia, each entry in Wikipedia must be about a topic that is encyclopedic and is not a dictionary entry or dictionary-style.[100] A topic should also meet Wikipedia's standards of "notability",[101] which generally means that the topic must have been covered in mainstream media or major academic journal sources that are independent of the article's subject. Further, Wikipedia intends to convey only knowledge that is already established and recognized.[102] It must not present original research. A claim that is likely to be challenged requires a reference to a reliable source. Among Wikipedia editors, this is often phrased as "verifiability, not truth" to express the idea that the readers, not the encyclopedia, are ultimately responsible for checking the truthfulness of the articles and making their own interpretations.[103] This can at times lead to the removal of information that, though valid, is not properly sourced.[104] Finally, Wikipedia must not take sides.[105]

Governance

Further information: Wikipedia:Administration

Wikipedia's initial anarchy integrated democratic and hierarchical elements over time.[106][107] An article is not considered to be owned by its creator or any other editor, nor by the subject of the article.[108]

Administrators

Editors in good standing in the community can request extra user rights, granting them the technical ability to perform certain special actions. In particular, editors can choose to run for "adminship",[109][110] which includes the ability to delete pages or prevent them from being changed in cases of severe vandalism or editorial disputes. Administrators are not supposed to enjoy any special Farming Simulator 2020 Crack + Keygen Code Free Download 2020 in decision-making; instead, their powers are mostly limited to making edits that have project-wide effects and thus are disallowed to ordinary editors, and to implement restrictions intended to prevent disruptive editors from making unproductive edits.[111][112]

By 2012, fewer editors were becoming administrators compared to Wikipedia's earlier years, in part because the process of vetting potential administrators had become more rigorous.[113]

Dispute resolution

Over time, Wikipedia has developed a semiformal dispute resolution process. To determine community consensus, editors can raise issues at appropriate community forums,[note 5] seek outside input through third opinion requests, or initiate a more general community discussion known as a "request for comment".

Arbitration Committee

Main article: Arbitration Committee

The Arbitration Committee presides over the ultimate dispute resolution process. Although disputes usually arise from a disagreement between two opposing views on how an article should read, the Arbitration Committee explicitly refuses to directly rule on the specific view that should be adopted. Statistical analyses suggest that the committee ignores the content of disputes and rather focuses on the way disputes are conducted,[114] functioning not so much to resolve disputes and make peace between conflicting editors, but to weed out problematic editors while allowing potentially productive editors back in to participate. Therefore, the committee does not dictate the content of articles, although it sometimes condemns content changes when it deems the new content violates Wikipedia policies (for example, if the new content is considered biased). Its remedies include cautions and probations (used in 63% of cases) and banning editors from articles (43%), subject matters (23%), or Wikipedia (16%).[when?] Complete bans from Wikipedia are generally limited to instances of impersonation and anti-social behavior. When conduct is not impersonation or anti-social, but rather anti-consensus or in violation of editing policies, remedies tend to be limited to warnings.[115]

Main article: Wikipedia community

Each article and each user of Wikipedia has an associated "talk" page. These form the primary communication channel for editors to discuss, coordinate and debate.[116]

Wikipedia's community has been described as cultlike,[117] although not always with entirely negative connotations.[118] Its preference for cohesiveness, even if it requires compromise that includes disregard of credentials, has been referred to as "anti-elitism".[119]

Wikipedians sometimes award one another "virtual barnstars" for good work. These personalized tokens of appreciation reveal a wide range of valued work extending far beyond simple editing to include social support, administrative actions, and types of articulation work.[120]

Wikipedia does not require that its editors and contributors provide identification.[121] As Wikipedia grew, "Who writes Wikipedia?" became one of the questions frequently asked there.[122] Jimmy Wales once argued that only "a sound forge pro 12. a dedicated group of a few hundred volunteers" makes the bulk of contributions to Wikipedia and that the project is therefore "much like any traditional organization".[123] In 2008, a Slate magazine article reported that: "According to researchers in Palo Alto, one percent of Wikipedia users are responsible for about half of the site's edits."[124] This method of evaluating contributions was later disputed by Aaron Swartz, who noted that several articles he sampled had large portions of their content (measured by number of characters) contributed by users with low edit counts.[125]

The English Wikipedia has 6,410,000 articles, 42,570,406 registered editors, and 125,342 active editors. An editor is considered active if they have made one or more edits in the past 30 days.

Editors who fail to comply with Wikipedia cultural rituals, such as signing talk page comments, may implicitly signal that they are Wikipedia outsiders, increasing the odds that Wikipedia insiders may target or discount their contributions. Becoming a Wikipedia insider involves non-trivial costs: the contributor is expected to learn Wikipedia-specific technological codes, submit to a sometimes convoluted dispute resolution process, and learn a "baffling culture rich with in-jokes and insider references".[126] Editors who do not log in are in some sense second-class citizens on Wikipedia,[126] as "participants are accredited by members of the wiki community, who have a vested interest in preserving the quality of the work product, on the basis of their ongoing participation",[127] but the contribution histories of anonymous unregistered editors recognized only by their IP addresses cannot be attributed to a particular editor with certainty.

Studies

A 2007 study by researchers from Dartmouth College found that "anonymous and infrequent contributors to Wikipedia . are as reliable a source of knowledge as those contributors who register with the site".[128] Jimmy Wales stated in 2009 that "[I]t turns out over 50% of all the edits are done by just .7% of the users . 524 people . And in fact, the most active 2%, which is 1400 people, have done 73.4% of all the edits."[123] However, Business Insider editor and journalist Henry Blodget showed in 2009 that in a random sample of articles, most Wikipedia content (measured by the amount of contributed text that survives to the latest sampled edit) is created by "outsiders", while most editing and formatting is done by "insiders".[123]

A 2008 study found that Wikipedians were less agreeable, open, and conscientious than others,[129][130] although a later commentary pointed out serious flaws, including that the data showed higher openness and that the differences with the control group and the samples were small.[131] According to a 2009 study, there is "evidence of growing resistance from the Wikipedia community to new content".[132]

Diversity

Several studies have shown that most Wikipedia contributors are male. Notably, the results of a Wikimedia Foundation survey in 2008 showed that only 13 percent of Wikipedia editors were female.[133] Because of this, universities throughout the United States tried to encourage women to become Wikipedia contributors. Similarly, many of these universities, including Yale and Brown, gave college credit to students who create or edit an article relating to women in science or technology.[134]Andrew Lih, a professor and scientist, wrote in The New York Times that the reason he thought the number of male contributors outnumbered the number of females so greatly was because identifying as a woman may expose oneself to "ugly, intimidating behavior".[135] Data has shown that Africans are underrepresented among Wikipedia editors.[136]

Language editions

Main article: List of Wikipedias

Most popular edition of Wikipedia by country in January 2021.
Most viewed editions of Wikipedia over time.
Most Farming Simulator 2020 Crack + Keygen Code Free Download 2020 editions of Wikipedia over time.

There are currently 325 language editions of Wikipedia (also called language versions, or simply Wikipedias). As of November 2021, the six largest, in order of article count, are the English, Cebuano, Swedish, German, French, and Dutch Wikipedias.[138] The second and third-largest Wikipedias owe their position to the article-creating botLsjbot, which as of 2013[update] had created about half the articles on the Swedish Wikipedia, and most of the articles in the Cebuano and Waray Wikipedias. The latter are both languages of the Philippines.

In addition to the top six, twelve other Wikipedias have more than a million articles each (Russian, Spanish, Italian, Polish, Egyptian Arabic, Japanese, Vietnamese, Waray, Chinese, Arabic, Ukrainian and Portuguese), seven more have over 500,000 articles (Persian, Catalan, Serbian, Indonesian, Norwegian, Korean and Finnish), 44 more have over 100,000, and 82 more have over 10,000.[139][138] The largest, the English Wikipedia, has over 6.4 million articles. As of January 2021,[update] the English Wikipedia receives 48% of Wikipedia's cumulative traffic, with the remaining split among the other languages. The top 10 editions represent approximately 85% of the total traffic.[140]

0.1 0.3 1 3

English 6,410,000

Cebuano 6,061,269

Swedish 2,875,133

German 2,633,307

French 2,374,875

Dutch 2,071,599

Russian 1,771,271

Spanish 1,731,740

Italian 1,726,497

Polish 1,496,868

Egyptian Arabic 1,376,598

Japanese 1,300,979

Vietnamese 1,270,091

Waray 1,265,576

Chinese 1,241,531

Arabic 1,143,365

Ukrainian 1,123,197

Portuguese 1,077,389

Persian 846,650

Catalan 689,772

The unit for the numbers in bars is articles.

Since Wikipedia is based on the Web and therefore worldwide, contributors to the same language edition may use different dialects or may come from different countries (as is the case for the English edition). These differences may lead to some conflicts over spelling differences (e.g. colour versus color)[142] or points of view.[143]

Though the various language editions are held to global policies such as "neutral point of view", they diverge on some points of policy and practice, most notably on whether images that are not licensed freely may be used under a claim of fair use.[144][145][146]

Jimmy Wales has described Wikipedia as "an effort to create and distribute Farming Simulator 2020 Crack + Keygen Code Free Download 2020 free encyclopedia of the highest possible quality to every single person on the planet in their own language".[147] Though each language edition functions more or less independently, some efforts are made to supervise them all. They are coordinated in part by Meta-Wiki, the Wikimedia Foundation's wiki devoted to maintaining all its projects (Wikipedia and others).[148] For instance, Meta-Wiki provides important statistics on all language editions of Wikipedia,[149] and it maintains a list of articles every Wikipedia should have.[150] The list concerns basic content by subject: biography, history, geography, society, culture, science, technology, and mathematics. It is not rare for articles strongly related to a particular language not to have counterparts in another edition. For example, articles about small towns in the United States might be available only in English, even when they meet the notability criteria of other language Wikipedia projects.

Estimation of contributions shares from different regions in the world to different Wikipedia editions[151]

Translated articles represent only a small portion of articles in most editions, in part because those editions do not allow fully automated translation of articles. Articles available in more than one language may offer "interwiki links", which link to the counterpart articles in other editions.[citation needed]

A study published by PLOS One in 2012 also estimated the share of contributions to different editions of Wikipedia from different regions of the world. It reported that the proportion of the edits made from North America was 51% for the English Wikipedia, and 25% for the simple English Wikipedia.[151]

English Wikipedia editor numbers

Number of editors on the English Wikipedia over time.

On March 1, 2014, The Economist, in an article titled "The Future of Wikipedia", cited a trend analysis concerning data published by the Wikimedia Foundation stating that "[t]he number of editors for the English-language version has fallen by a third in seven years."[152] The attrition rate for active editors in English Wikipedia was cited by The Economist as substantially in contrast to statistics for Wikipedia in other languages (non-English Wikipedia). The Economist reported that the number of contributors with an average of five or more edits per month was relatively constant since 2008 for Wikipedia in other languages at approximately 42,000 editors within narrow seasonal variances of about 2,000 editors up or down. The number of active editors in English Wikipedia, by sharp comparison, was cited as peaking in 2007 at approximately 50,000 and dropping to 30,000 by the start of 2014.

In contrast, the trend analysis published in The Economist presents Wikipedia in other languages (non-English Wikipedia) as successful in retaining their active editors on a renewable and sustained basis, with their numbers remaining relatively constant at approximately 42,000.[152] No comment was made concerning which of the differentiated edit policy standards from Wikipedia in other languages (non-English Wikipedia) would provide a possible alternative to English Wikipedia for effectively ameliorating substantial editor attrition rates on the English-language Wikipedia.[153]

Reception

See also: Academic studies about Wikipedia and Criticism of Wikipedia

Ambox current red.svg

This section needs to be updated. Please help update this article to reflect recent events or newly available information.(March 2018)

Various Wikipedians have criticized Wikipedia's large and growing regulation, which includes more than fifty policies and nearly 150,000 words as of 2014.[update][154][155]

Critics have stated that Wikipedia exhibits systemic bias. In 2010, columnist and journalist Edwin Black described Wikipedia as being a mixture of "truth, half-truth, and some falsehoods".[156] Articles in The Chronicle of Higher Education and The Journal of Academic Librarianship have criticized Wikipedia's "Undue Weight" policy, concluding that the fact that Wikipedia explicitly is not designed to provide correct information about a subject, but rather focus on all the major viewpoints on the subject, give less attention to minor ones, and creates omissions that can lead to false beliefs based on incomplete information.[157][158][159]

Journalists Oliver Kamm and Edwin Black alleged (in 2010 and 2011 respectively) that articles are dominated by the loudest and most persistent voices, usually by a group with an "ax to grind" on the topic.[156][160] A 2008 article in Education Next Journal concluded that as a resource about controversial topics, Wikipedia is subject to manipulation and spin.[161]

In 2020, Omer Benjakob and Stephen Harrison noted that "Media coverage of Wikipedia has radically shifted over the past two decades: once cast as an intellectual frivolity, it is now lauded as the 'last bastion of shared reality' online."[162]

In 2006, the Wikipedia Watch criticism website listed dozens of examples of plagiarism in the English Wikipedia.[163]

Accuracy of content

Main article: Reliability of Wikipedia

Articles for traditional encyclopedias such as Encyclopædia Britannica are written by experts, lending such encyclopedias a reputation for accuracy.[164] However, a peer review in 2005 of forty-two scientific entries on both Wikipedia and Encyclopædia Britannica by the science journal Nature found few differences in accuracy, and concluded that "the average science entry in Wikipedia contained around four inaccuracies; Britannica, about three."[165] Joseph Reagle suggested that while the study reflects "a topical strength of Wikipedia contributors" in science articles, "Wikipedia may not have fared so well using a random sampling of articles or on humanities subjects."[166] Others raised similar critiques.[167] The findings by Nature were disputed by Encyclopædia Britannica,[168][169] and in response, Nature gave a rebuttal of the points raised by Britannica.[170] In addition to the point-for-point disagreement between these two parties, others have examined the sample size and selection method used in the Nature effort, and suggested a "flawed study design" (in Nature's manual selection of articles, in part or in whole, for comparison), absence of statistical analysis (e.g., of reported confidence intervals), and a lack of study "statistical power" (i.e., owing to small sample size, 42 or 4 × 101 articles compared, vs >105 and >106 set sizes for Britannica and the English Wikipedia, respectively).[171]

As a consequence of the open structure, Wikipedia "makes no guarantee of validity" of its content, since no one is ultimately responsible for any claims appearing in it.[172] Concerns have been raised by PC World in 2009 regarding the lack of accountability that results from users' anonymity,[173] the insertion of false information,[174]vandalism, and similar problems.

Economist Tyler Cowen wrote: "If I had to guess whether Wikipedia or the median refereed journal article on economics was more likely to be true after a not so long think I would opt for Wikipedia." He comments that some traditional sources of non-fiction suffer from systemic biases, and novel results, in his opinion, are over-reported in journal articles as well as relevant information being omitted from news reports. However, he also cautions that errors are frequently found on Internet sites and that academics and experts must be vigilant in correcting them.[175]Amy Bruckman has argued that, due to the number of reviewers, "the content of a popular Wikipedia page is actually the most reliable form of information ever created".[176]

Critics argue that Wikipedia's open nature and a lack of proper sources for most of the information makes it unreliable.[177] Some commentators suggest that Wikipedia may be reliable, but that the reliability of any given article is not clear.[178] Editors of traditional reference works Farming Simulator 2020 Crack + Keygen Code Free Download 2020 as the Encyclopædia Britannica have questioned the project's utility and status as an encyclopedia.[179] Wikipedia co-founder Jimmy Wales has claimed that Wikipedia has largely avoided the problem of "fake news" because the Wikipedia community regularly debates the quality of sources in articles.[180]

Wikipedia's open structure inherently makes it an easy target for Internet trolls, spammers, and various forms of paid advocacy seen as counterproductive to the maintenance of a neutral and verifiable online encyclopedia.[80][182] In response to paid advocacy editing and undisclosed editing issues, Wikipedia was reported in an article in The Wall Street Journal, to have strengthened its rules and laws against undisclosed editing.[183] The article stated that: "Beginning Monday [from the date of the article, June 16, 2014], changes in Wikipedia's terms of use will require anyone paid to edit articles to disclose that arrangement. Katherine Maher, the nonprofit Wikimedia Foundation's chief communications officer, said the changes address a sentiment among volunteer editors that, 'we're not an advertising service; we're an encyclopedia.'"[183][184][185][186][187] These issues, among others, had been parodied since the first decade of Wikipedia, notably by Stephen Colbert on The Colbert Report.[188]

A Harvard law textbook, Legal Research in a Nutshell (2011), cites Wikipedia as a "general source" that "can be a real boon" in "coming up to speed in the law governing a situation" and, "while not authoritative, can provide basic facts as well as leads to more in-depth resources".[189]

Discouragement in education

Ambox current red.svg

This section needs to be updated. Please help update this article to reflect recent events or newly available information.(December 2020)

Most university lecturers discourage students from citing any encyclopedia in academic work, preferring primary sources;[190] some specifically prohibit Wikipedia citations. Wales stresses that encyclopedias of any type are not usually appropriate to use as citable sources, and should not be relied upon as authoritative.[193] Wales once (2006 or earlier) said he receives about ten emails weekly from students saying they got failing grades on papers because they cited Wikipedia; he told the students they got what they deserved. "For God's sake, you're in college; don't cite the encyclopedia," he said.[194]

In February 2007, an article in The Harvard Crimson newspaper reported that a few of the professors at Harvard University were including Wikipedia articles in their syllabi, although without realizing the articles might change.[195] In June 2007, former president of the American Library AssociationMichael Gorman condemned Wikipedia, along with Google,[196] stating that academics who endorse the use of Wikipedia are "the intellectual equivalent of a dietitian who recommends a steady diet of Big Macs with everything".

In contrast, academic writing[clarification needed] in Wikipedia has evolved in recent years and has been found to increase student interest, personal connection to the product, creativity in material processing, and international collaboration in the learning process.[197]

Medical information

See also: Health information on Wikipedia

On March 5, 2014, Julie Beck writing for The Atlantic magazine in an article titled "Doctors' #1 Source for Healthcare Information: Wikipedia", stated that "Fifty percent of physicians look up conditions on the (Wikipedia) site, and some are editing articles themselves to improve the quality of available information."[198] Beck continued to detail in this article new programs of Amin Azzam at the University of San Francisco to offer medical school courses to medical students for learning to edit and improve Wikipedia articles on health-related issues, as well as internal quality control programs within Wikipedia organized by James Heilman to improve a group of 200 health-related articles of central medical importance up to Wikipedia's highest standard of articles using its Featured Article and Good Article peer-review evaluation process.[198] In a May 7, 2014, follow-up article in The Atlantic titled "Can Wikipedia Ever Be a Definitive Medical Text?", Julie Beck quotes WikiProject Medicine's James Heilman as stating: "Just because a reference is peer-reviewed doesn't mean it's a high-quality reference."[199] Beck added that: "Wikipedia has its own peer review process before articles can be classified as 'good' or 'featured'. Heilman, who has participated in that process before, says 'less than one percent' of Wikipedia's medical articles have passed."[199]

Quality of writing

Screenshot of English Wikipedia's article on Earth, a featured-class article

In a 2006 mention of Jimmy Wales, Time magazine stated that the policy of allowing anyone to edit had made Wikipedia the "biggest (and perhaps best) encyclopedia in the world".[200]

In 2008, researchers at Carnegie Mellon University found that the quality of a Wikipedia article would suffer rather than gain from adding more writers when the article lacked appropriate explicit or implicit coordination.[201] For instance, when contributors rewrite small portions of an entry rather than making full-length revisions, high- and low-quality content may be intermingled within an entry. Roy Rosenzweig, a history professor, stated that American National Biography Online outperformed Wikipedia in terms of its "clear and engaging prose", which, he said, was an important aspect of good historical writing.[202] Contrasting Wikipedia's treatment of Abraham Lincoln to that of Civil War historian James McPherson in American National Biography Online, he said that both were essentially accurate and covered the major episodes in Lincoln's life, but praised "McPherson's richer contextualization . his artful use of quotations to capture Lincoln's voice . and . his ability to convey a profound message in a handful of words." By contrast, he gives an example of Wikipedia's prose that he finds "both verbose and dull". Rosenzweig also criticized the "waffling—encouraged by the NPOV policy—[which] means that it is hard to discern any overall interpretive stance in Wikipedia history". While generally praising the article on William Clarke Quantrill, he quoted its conclusion as an example of such "waffling", which then stated: "Some historians . remember him as an opportunistic, bloodthirsty outlaw, while others continue to view him as a daring soldier and local folk hero."[202]

Other critics have made similar charges that, even if Wikipedia articles are factually accurate, they are often written in a poor, almost unreadable style. Frequent Wikipedia critic Andrew Orlowski commented, "Even when a Wikipedia entry is 100 percent factually correct, and those facts have been carefully chosen, it all too often reads as if it has been translated from one language to another then into a third, passing an illiterate translator at each stage."[203] A study of Wikipedia articles on cancer was conducted in 2010 by Yaacov Lawrence of the Kimmel Cancer Center at Thomas Jefferson University. The study was limited to those articles that could be found in the Physician Data Query and excluded those written at the "start" class or "stub" class level. Lawrence found the articles accurate but not very readable, and thought that "Wikipedia's lack of readability (to non-college readers) may reflect its varied origins and haphazard editing".[204]The Economist argued that better-written articles tend to be more reliable: "inelegant or ranting prose usually reflects muddled thoughts and incomplete information".[205]

Coverage of topics and systemic bias

See also: Notability in the English Wikipedia and Criticism of Wikipedia § Systemic bias in coverage

Ambox current red.svg

Parts of this article (those related to d:Wikidata:Statistics/Wikipedia) need to be updated. Please help update this article to reflect recent events or newly available information.(March 2017)

Wikipedia seeks to create a summary of all human knowledge in the form of an online encyclopedia, with each topic covered encyclopedically in one article. Since it has terabytes of disk space, it can have far more topics than can be covered by any printed encyclopedia.[206] The exact degree and manner of coverage on Wikipedia is under constant review by its editors, and disagreements are not uncommon (see deletionism and inclusionism).[207][208] Wikipedia contains materials that some people may find objectionable, offensive, or pornographic. The "Wikipedia is not censored" policy has sometimes proved controversial: in 2008, Wikipedia rejected an online petition against the inclusion of images of Muhammad in the English edition of its Muhammad article, citing this policy. The presence of politically, religiously, and pornographically sensitive materials in Wikipedia has led to the censorship of Wikipedia by national authorities in China[209] and Pakistan,[210] amongst other countries.

A 2008 study conducted by researchers at Carnegie Mellon University and Palo Alto Research Center gave a distribution of topics as well as growth (from July 2006 to January 2008) in each field:[211]

  • Culture and Arts: 30% (210%)
  • Biographies and persons: 15% (97%)
  • Geography and places: 14% (52%)
  • Society and social sciences: 12% (83%)
  • History and events: 11% (143%)
  • Natural and Physical Sciences: 9% (213%)
  • Technology and Applied Science: 4% (−6%)
  • Religions and belief systems: 2% (38%)
  • Health: 2% (42%)
  • Mathematics and logic: 1% (146%)
  • Thought and Philosophy: 1% (160%)

These numbers refer only to the number of articles: it is possible for one topic to contain a large number of short articles and another to contain a small number of large ones. Through its "Wikipedia Loves Libraries" program, Wikipedia has partnered with major public libraries such as the New York Public Library for the Performing Arts to expand its coverage of underrepresented subjects and articles.[212]

A 2011 study conducted by researchers at the University of Minnesota indicated that male and female editors focus on different coverage topics. There was a greater concentration of females in the "people and arts" category, while males focus more on "geography and science".[213]

Coverage of topics and selection bias

Research conducted by Mark Graham of the Oxford Internet Institute in 2009 indicated that the geographic distribution of article topics is highly uneven. Africa is the most underrepresented.[214] Across 30 language editions of Wikipedia, historical articles and sections are generally Eurocentric and focused on recent events.[215]

An editorial in The Guardian Farming Simulator 2020 Crack + Keygen Code Free Download 2020 2014 claimed that more effort went into providing references for a list of female porn actors than a list of women writers.[216] Data has also shown that Africa-related material often faces omission; a knowledge gap that a July 2018 Wikimedia conference in Cape Town sought to address.[136]

Systemic biases

When multiple editors contribute to one topic or set of topics, systemic bias may arise, due to the demographic backgrounds of the editors. In 2011, Wales claimed that the unevenness of coverage is a reflection of the demography of the editors, citing for example "biographies of famous women through history and issues surrounding early childcare".[48] The October 22, 2013, essay by Tom Simonite in MIT's Technology Review titled "The Decline of Wikipedia" discussed the effect of systemic bias and policy creep on the downward trend in the number of editors.[49]

Systemic bias on Wikipedia may follow that of culture generally,[vague] for example favoring certain nationalities, ethnicities or majority religions.[217] It may more specifically follow the biases of Internet culture, inclining to be young, male, English-speaking, educated, technologically Farming Simulator 2020 Crack + Keygen Code Free Download 2020, and wealthy enough to spare time for editing. Biases, intrinsically, may include an overemphasis on topics such as pop culture, technology, and current events.[217]

Taha Yasseri of the University of Oxford, in 2013, studied the statistical trends of systemic bias at Wikipedia introduced by editing conflicts and their resolution.[218][219] His research examined the counterproductive work behavior of edit warring. Yasseri contended that simple reverts or "undo" operations were not the most significant measure of counterproductive behavior at Wikipedia and relied instead on the statistical measurement of detecting "reverting/reverted pairs" or "mutually reverting edit pairs". Such a "mutually reverting edit pair" is defined where one editor reverts the edit of another editor who then, in sequence, returns to revert the first editor in the "mutually reverting edit pairs". The results were tabulated for several language versions of Wikipedia. The English Wikipedia's three largest conflict rates belonged to the articles George W. Bush, anarchism, and Muhammad.[219] By comparison, for the German Wikipedia, the three largest conflict rates at the time of the Oxford study were for the articles covering Croatia, Scientology, and 9/11 conspiracy theories.[219]

Researchers from Washington University developed a statistical model to measure systematic bias in the behavior of Wikipedia's users regarding controversial topics. The authors focused on behavioral changes of the encyclopedia's administrators after assuming the post, writing that systematic bias occurred after the fact.[220][221]

Explicit content

See also: Internet Watch Foundation and Wikipedia and Reporting of child pornography images on Wikimedia Commons

"Wikipedia censorship" redirects here. For the government censorship of Wikipedia, see Censorship of Wikipedia. For Wikipedia's policy concerning censorship, see Wikipedia:Wikipedia is not censored

Wikipedia has been criticized for allowing information about graphic content. Articles depicting what some critics have called objectionable content (such as feces, cadaver, human penis, smart defrag 6.5 0.92 key - Activators Patch, and nudity) contain graphic pictures and detailed information easily available to anyone with access to the internet, including children.

The site also includes sexual content such as images and videos of masturbation and ejaculation, illustrations of zoophilia, and photos from hardcore pornographic films in its articles. It also has non-sexual photographs of nude children.

The Wikipedia article about Virgin Killer—a 1976 album from the GermanrockbandScorpions—features a picture of the album's original cover, which depicts a naked prepubescent girl. The original release cover caused controversy and was replaced in some countries. In December 2008, access to the Wikipedia article Virgin Killer was blocked for four days by most Internet service providers in the United Kingdom after the Internet Watch Foundation (IWF) decided the album cover was a potentially illegal indecent image and added the article's URL to a "blacklist" it supplies to British internet service providers.[222]

In April 2010, Sanger wrote a letter to the Federal Bureau of Investigation, outlining his concerns that two categories of images on Wikimedia Commons contained child pornography, and were in violation of US federal obscenity law.[223][224] Sanger later clarified that the images, which were related to pedophilia and one about lolicon, were not of real children, but said that they constituted "obscene visual representations of the sexual abuse of children", under the PROTECT Act of 2003.[225] That law bans photographic child pornography and cartoon images and drawings of children that are obscene under American law.[225] Sanger also expressed concerns about access to the images on Wikipedia in schools.[226]Wikimedia Foundation spokesman Jay Walsh strongly rejected Sanger's accusation,[227] saying that Wikipedia did not have "material we would deem to be illegal. If we did, we would remove it."[227] Following the complaint by Sanger, Wales deleted sexual images without consulting the community. After some editors who volunteer to maintain the site argued that the decision to delete had been made hastily, Wales voluntarily gave up some of the powers he had held up to that time as part of his co-founder status. He wrote in a message to the Wikimedia Foundation mailing-list that this action was "in the interest of encouraging this discussion to be about real philosophical/content issues, rather than be about me and how quickly I acted".[228] Critics, including Wikipediocracy, noticed that many of the pornographic images deleted from Wikipedia since 2010 have reappeared.[229]

Privacy

One privacy concern in the case of Wikipedia is the right of a private citizen to remain a "private citizen" rather than a "public figure" in the eyes of the law.[230][note 6] It is a battle between the right to be anonymous in cyberspace and the right to be anonymous in real life ("meatspace"). A particular problem occurs in the case of a relatively unimportant individual and for whom there exists a Wikipedia page against her or his wishes.

In January 2006, a German court ordered the German Wikipedia shut down within Germany because it stated the full name of Boris Floricic, aka "Tron", a deceased hacker. On February 9, 2006, the injunction against Wikimedia Deutschland was overturned, with the court rejecting the notion that Tron's right to privacy or that of his parents was being violated.[231]

Wikipedia has a "Volunteer Response Team" that uses Znuny, a free and open-source software fork of OTRS[232] to handle queries without having to reveal the identities of the involved parties. This is used, for example, in confirming the permission for using individual images and other media in the project.[233]

Sexism

Main article: Gender bias on Wikipedia

Wikipedia was described in 2015 as harboring a battleground culture of sexism and harassment.[234][235]

The perceived toxic attitudes and tolerance of violent and abusive language were reasons put Farming Simulator 2020 Crack + Keygen Code Free Download 2020 in 2013 for the gender gap in Wikipedia editorship.[236]

Edit-a-thons have been held to encourage female editors and increase the coverage of women's topics.[237]

A comprehensive 2008 survey, published in 2016, found significant gender differences in: confidence in expertise, discomfort with editing, and response to critical feedback. "Women reported less confidence in their expertise, expressed greater discomfort with editing (which typically involves conflict), and reported more negative responses to critical feedback compared to men."[238]

Operation

Wikimedia Foundation and Wikimedia movement affiliates

Main article: Wikimedia Foundation

Wikipedia is hosted and funded by the Wikimedia Foundation, a non-profit organization which also operates Wikipedia-related projects such as Wiktionary and Wikibooks. The foundation relies on public contributions and grants to fund its mission.[239] The foundation's 2013 IRS Form 990 shows revenue of $39.7 million and expenses of almost $29 million, with assets of $37.2 million and liabilities of about $2.3 million.[240]

In May 2014, Wikimedia Foundation named Lila Tretikov as its second executive director, taking over for Sue Gardner.[241] The Wall Street Journal reported on May 1, 2014, that Tretikov's information technology background from her years at University of California offers Wikipedia an opportunity to develop in more concentrated directions guided by her often repeated position statement that, "Information, like air, wants to be free."[242][243] The same Wall Street Journal article reported these directions of development according to an interview with spokesman Jay Walsh of Wikimedia, who "said Tretikov would address that issue (paid advocacy) as a priority. 'We are really pushing toward more transparency . We are reinforcing that paid advocacy is not welcome.' Initiatives to involve greater diversity of contributors, better mobile support of Wikipedia, new geo-location tools to find local content more easily, and more tools for users in the second and third world are also priorities," Walsh said.[242]

Following the departure of Tretikov from Wikipedia due to issues concerning the use of the "superprotection" feature which some language versions of Wikipedia have adopted, Katherine Maher grids for instagram 6 the third executive director of the Wikimedia Foundation in June 2016.[244] Maher has stated that one of her priorities would be the issue of editor harassment endemic to Wikipedia as identified by the Wikipedia board in December. Maher stated regarding the harassment issue that: "It establishes a sense within the community that this is a priority . (and that correction requires that) it has to be more than words."[245]

Wikipedia is also supported by many organizations and groups that are affiliated with the Wikimedia Foundation but independently-run, called Wikimedia movement affiliates. These include Wikimedia chapters (which are national or sub-national organizations, such as Wikimedia Deutschland and Wikimédia France), thematic organizations (such as Amical Wikimedia for the Catalan language community), and user groups. These affiliates participate in the promotion, development, and funding of Wikipedia.

Software operations and support

See also: MediaWiki

The operation of Wikipedia depends on MediaWiki, a custom-made, free and open sourcewiki software platform written in PHP and built upon the MySQL database system.[246] The software incorporates programming features such as a macro language, variables, a transclusion system for templates, and URL redirection. MediaWiki is licensed under the GNU General Public License (GPL) and it is used by all Wikimedia projects, as well as many other wiki projects. Originally, Wikipedia ran on UseModWiki written in Perl by Clifford Adams (Phase I), which initially required CamelCase for article hyperlinks; the present double bracket style was incorporated later. Starting in January 2002 (Phase II), Wikipedia began running on a PHP wiki engine with a MySQL database; this software was custom-made for Wikipedia by Magnus Manske. The Phase II software was repeatedly modified to accommodate the exponentially increasing demand. In July 2002 (Phase III), Wikipedia shifted to the third-generation software, MediaWiki, originally written by Lee Daniel Crocker.

Several MediaWiki extensions are installed[247] to extend the functionality of the MediaWiki software.

In April 2005, a Lucene extension[248][249] was added to MediaWiki's built-in search and Wikipedia switched from MySQL to Lucene for searching. Lucene was later replaced by CirrusSearch which is based on Elasticsearch.[250]

In July 2013, after extensive beta testing, a WYSIWYG (What You See Is What You Get) extension, VisualEditor, was opened to public use.[251][252][253][254] It was met with much rejection and criticism, and was described as "slow and buggy".[255] The feature was changed from opt-out to opt-in afterward.

Automated editing

Main article: Wikipedia bots

Computer programs called bots have often been used to perform simple and repetitive tasks, such as correcting common misspellings and stylistic issues, or to start articles such as geography entries in a standard format from statistical data.[256][257][258] One controversial contributor, Sverker Johansson, creating articles with his bot was reported to create up to 10,000 articles on the Swedish Wikipedia on certain days.[259] Additionally, there are bots designed to automatically notify editors when they make common editing errors (such as unmatched quotes or unmatched parentheses).[260] Edits falsely identified by bots as the work of a banned editor can be restored by other editors. An anti-vandal bot is programmed to detect and revert vandalism quickly.[257] Bots are able to indicate edits from particular accounts or IP address ranges, as occurred at the time of the shooting down of the MH17 jet incident in July 2014 when it was reported that edits were made via IPs controlled by the Russian government.[261] Bots on Wikipedia must be approved before activation.[262]

According to Andrew Lih, the current expansion of Wikipedia to millions of articles would be difficult to envision without the use of such bots.[263]

Hardware operations and support

See also: Wikimedia Foundation § Hardware

Wikipedia receives between 25,000 and 60,000-page requests per second, depending on the time of the day.[264][needs update] As of 2021,[update] page requests are first winzip driver updater virus - Crack Key For U to a front-end layer of Varnish caching servers and back-end layer caching is done by Apache Traffic Server.[265]

Источник: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia

Skidrow Codex Games – Download Torrent PC Games

Medieval Dynasty - CODEX + Update v1.0.0.9

Medieval Dynasty - CODEX + Update v1.0.0.9
  • CODEX
  • 1.0.0.9
  • FREE DOWNLOAD
  • TORRENT
Medieval Dynasty— is a 3D RPG and survival simulator created by the Polish studio Render Cube. This is the second game from the ód team that is completely different from its debut project the Monster League kart racing game from 2018. This time, the Poles have created a realistic series about the Middle Ages, reminiscent of the Czech game Kingdom Come Deliverance. The game is also another part of the Dynasty series, although it is clearly different from its predecessors. The main character is a talented hunter who was expelled from his house for unknown reasons. Now he and his family must fight desperately to survive in a medieval world full of dangers.

The game is updated Yesterday, 14:46, to the latest version 1.0.0.9.

Read more / Download

Motorcycle Mechanic Simulator 2021 Build 7728817 - CODEX

Motorcycle Mechanic Simulator 2021 Build 7728817 - CODEX
  • CODEX
  • Build 7728817
  • FREE DOWNLOAD
  • TORRENT
Motorcycle Mechanic Simulator 2021is a very realistic mechanic simulator, but it offers to engage in cars. as usual, but with very different and painfully familiar motorcycles. Now you are the owner of a garage, a small room that will make a good workshop. Become a mechanic and start doing motorcycles in your garage, learn to assemble and repair motorcycles, develop your business in every possible way, pump your garage and try to eventually turn it into a real motorcycle empire. You are free, and no one tells you what to do and when.

Read more / Download

Detroit Become Human - CODEX + Update v20211117

Detroit Become Human - CODEX + Update v20211117
  • CODEX
  • Update v20211117
  • FREE DOWNLOAD
  • TORRENT
Detroit Become Human— game for PC, offers a glimpse into the world of the near future, where by 2038, humanoid androids walk along the streets along with people. Their calling is to help their creators, although they are in no way inferior to those in manners, ability to communicate and analyze actions. But the development of technology is not always beneficial, which is confirmed by rumors about the emergence of deviants — intelligent machines that managed to recognize their nature. The plot is designed to show the world through the eyes of an artificially created person. To do this, we are controlled by several characters in turn.

The game is updated Yesterday, Farming Simulator 2020 Crack + Keygen Code Free Download 2020, to the latest version Update v20211117.

Read more / Download

Neverlooted Dungeon v2021.11.17 demo

Neverlooted Dungeon v2021.11.17 demo
  • demo v2021.11.17
  • FREE DOWNLOAD
  • TORRENT
Neverlooted Dungeon— is a first-person action-adventure RPG set in dark dungeons with numerous traps, obstacles and puzzles for the hero. The gameplay is tied to physics, and all puzzles are based on interaction with the environment. Almost Epic Adventures Neverlooted Dungeon is inspired by Ultima Underworld. The gameplay combines elements of action and sim immersive. Enter the dark dungeon world to find out if the map of the old man from the tavern, which talks about the Legendary treasure in the bowels of ancient dungeons, is true. This is full and latest version game Neverlooted Dungeon v2021.11.17 demoat the moment, you can download torrent now. The Neurluted Dungeon has been plundered by the most courageous adventurers for centuries.

Read more / Download

CountryBalls Heroes Build 7722318 - PLAZA

CountryBalls Heroes Build 7722318 - PLAZA
  • PLAZA
  • Build 7722318
  • FREE DOWNLOAD
  • TORRENT
CountryBalls Heroes game which you will be able to download torrent for free in just a couple of months, is a global turn-based strategy game Inscryption with elements of a tactical simulator, as well as 2D graphics and fantastic stylistics. Here you have to choose the preferred side of the conflict, namely, definitely the state, which is represented by such unusual heroes as the strangers. Try to rank yourself among the legends of this world, leading an army of ball-shaped units. Unite your troops under your banner, build cities, accumulate powerful artifacts, and also prove to everyone that you can rightfully be called the most powerful stranger.

Read more / Download

Forza Horizon 5 Premium Edition v1.405.2.0 + DLC + Multiplayer - FitGirl RePack

Forza Horizon 5 Premium Edition v1.405.2.0 + DLC + Multiplayer - FitGirl RePack
  • FitGirl RePack
  • 1.405.2.0 + DLC + Multiplayer
  • FREE DOWNLOAD
  • TORRENT
Immerse yourself in a series of insane high-speed races as you start playing Forza Horizon 5 Premium Edition, travel to Mexico with its varied landscapes and the most unusual locations for racing races, access the largest open world in the series and find yourself behind the wheel of one of the most legendary cars. Not so much is known about the plot of the game at the moment, but given the experience of the developers and the traditions of the series as a whole, we can safely say that the new game will focus the players' attention exclusively on the races. And yes, a huge open world awaits you in the new game, new technical features, many realistically recreated licensed cars.

Read more / Download

Dice Gambit v0.2.38

Dice Gambit v0.2.38
  • 0.2.38
  • FREE DOWNLOAD
  • TORRENT
Dice Gambit— is a tactical turn-based battle game in which you will throw dice to control your characters. In this version of the game you will go through 6 missions with unique enemies, including a battle with the boss, using 3 different characters with their own set of capabilities. This is full and latest version game Dice Gambit v0.2.38 at the moment, you can download torrent now. Adapt to bone throws. Optimize each move depending on the throw or use a repeat throw if you are in a difficult position. Combine bones to gain powerful abilities. Double or turn a few cubes into new and exciting effects. Bright and colorful world drawn by hand.

Read more / Download

Grid Force Mask of the Goddess v2021.10.29v2

Grid Force Mask of the Goddess v2021.10.29v2
  • 2021.10.29v2
  • FREE DOWNLOAD
  • TORRENT
Grid Force Mask Of The Goddess— is an action game with strategy and RPG elements that follows the adventures of Donna and her friends throughout the women’s cities of the Mountain. Donna needs to assemble a team, defeat 9 goddesses, gather their power and save the world from collapse in just three days. This is full and latest version game Grid Force Mask of the Goddess v2021.10.29v2at the moment, you can download torrent now. Move fast across mesh arenas, avoiding deadly attacks and using your team’s unique abilities to defeat and recruit over 40 unique characters. The game features a unique graphic style inspired by 70s posters and original 90s pop.

The game is updated Yesterday, 11:32, to the latest version 2021.10.29v2.

Read more / Download

Archvale v1.2

Archvale v1.2
  • 1.2
  • FREE DOWNLOAD
  • TORRENT
The history of Archvalebegins in ancient times, when the fabulous Valley was ruled by a cruel and evil king who terrorized all the inhabitants and plundered the country. Many daredevils wanted to overthrow the villain. The king cursed such losers and put them in dungeons, where they serve eternal punishment. This is full and latest version game Archvale v1.2at the moment, you can download torrent now. The Evil King has been gone for a long time, everyone has forgotten about the Valley, and the Immortals are still waiting in the wings. Ridding the world of the shadows of the evil king will be the main responsibility of two or four players looking for a portal to the fairy Valley.

Read more / Download

Unsouled v1.0.43.0

Unsouled v1.0.43.0
  • 1.0.43.0
  • FREE DOWNLOAD
  • TORRENT
Unsouled— role-playing adventure action in which you are waiting for endless battles with various enemies, adventure, a huge partially open world, and more. Unfortunately, not so much is known about the plot of the game at the moment, but it is known that it revolves around a boy and a girl whose fates are closely intertwined due to their general ability to absorb the souls of dead enemies. This is full and latest version game Unsouled v1.0.43.0 Steam Early Accessat the moment, you can download torrent now. You will have to go on a long and dangerous journey, fight a bunch of different enemies, write a fate script based on your own decisions and actions, and much more.

The game is updated Yesterday, 11:10, to the latest version 1.0.43.0.

Read more / Download

Huge and diverse world of PC games. Every day there are a lot of new PC Games, you can Download Torrent, and we provide only the best and current games download torrent for free on PC, only on high speed. We collect a collection of only the highest quality and interesting games from various release groups: by SKIDROW, CODEX, RELOADED, PLAZA. Each game that is posted on the site Skidrow Codex Games will regularly receive current Updates, Patches and DLCs, so that there would be an opportunity to update it to the Latest version and Full version without any problems.

It is worth noting that the diversity is so great that all releases are divided by genre. Filter out only the torrent files you are interested in and pay more attention to potentially interesting releases. In the presence of the game on the passage, cool, original, cool and modern. All only full versions. You can sort releases in different ways — by studio, manufacturer, by year, we choose the best options. In each release game there is a description, colorful Screenshots and Trailer, System Requirements to get the most complete picture of the game. Leaving comments and grading you help other gamers to orient which of the submitted projects deserve more attention.

Only here besides the Full version of the game on the PC, you can also download separately the Update, patches for the next update of the game itself. Skidrow Codex Games — is a site, dedicated to quality games that can be easily download torrent and updates to games.

Источник: https://skidrowcodex.co/

Precision Farming: New free DLC for Farming Simulator 22

Have you downloaded the free Precision Farming DLC for Farming Simulator 19? If not, try it out! When released last December, we added some smart farming technology to the game. But, that was only the beginning. You'll be able to keep lowering the environmental footprint on your virtual farm in the near future! 

More Precision Farming coming to Farming Simulator 22


The "Precision Farming Project" continues with a new and improved DLC for Farming Simulator 22. Including the initial versions features like soil types, soil sampling, variable rate applications and economic analysis, the focus of the new DLC will go further.

Advanced precision farming technologies will be implemented: To increase the sustainability of your farms, optical sensors will be introduced. Thus, allowing a reduced application of herbicides as well as organic and mineral fertilizers. 

We'll go further into detail and look at the new features and improvements later. As you know, we're currently working hard to bring you Farming Simulator 22 on November 22nd. Regarding that, look at this shiny new banner you can click on:

Successful project is growing bigger


The first version of the Precision Farming DLC for Farming Simulator 19 was a great success, and was downloaded one million times world-wide on PC and consoles. If you missed the news on the initial Precision Farming DLC, here's what you should know:

Initiated in 2020 by John Deere and funded by EIT Food, Europe’s leading Food Innovation Initiative, the projects' goal is to provide knowledge regarding sustainable farming technology. Implementing Precision Farming in Farming Simulator is one of EITs steps to increase awareness.

Besides EIT Food and John Deere, various partners from the European Union are also part of the my notes download - Free Activators The University of Hohenheim (Germany), the University of Reading (Great Britain), and Grupo AN (the largest cereal cooperative in Spain). New to the table this year is the Institute of Animal Reproduction and Food Research from the Polish Academy of Sciences to promote the technology among young farmers in Eastern Europe.

Free DLC releases next Spring - more at FarmCon


The above-mentioned partners are key to the continuation of the project. The first DLC was evaluated thoroughly by agricultural experts, students, farmers and others. Of course, player feedback was an important factor when deciding on how to advance the project. That's why you can also expect some improvements to the already existing features based upon your feedback.

While we're focused on the upcoming release of Farming Simulator 22 on November 22nd, the new version of the Precision Farming DLC is scheduled to release in the Spring of 2022. All owners of Farming Simulator 22 on PC, Mac, PlayStation 5, Xbox Series X Disjunction ACTIVATION.Disjunction serial key generator. Keygen is a small program used to change the software in such a way it won’t ask you for serial numbers anymore. Download The Sims 4 Serial Key Generator now free. Encodya license key.txt free download. FIFA 19 Key Generator for PC is a Collection of Institution football Video-games or football Simulation Game, Published annually by Electronics below the EA Sports Tag. Black And White Pc Game: 25. Age of Wonders: Planetfall Keygen Generator Online Activation License. It is the most popular PC game at this time. The Abluescarab Designs CD-Key Generator will help you generate random CD keys for use in your shareware products. EzReg works with EzWeb content storage files to apply machine license keys so that the file cannot be read unless licensed, so you can lock down your content to only licensed machines.The download includes all of the Visual Basic source …
Sccm Report Software Installed Date, Buxton Police Beat, Cva Scout Pistol Review, Minecraft Pandoras Creatures Wiki, Sword Of Descension Genshin Impact How To Get, Modern Warfare Directx 11 Vs 12, Why Was American Pickers Cancelled, Coochie Man Song Tiktok, Otaku Bio For Instagram, Wandavision Reddit 7,

Источник: https://top5-posturecorrector.co/lost-song-suchqip/license-key-generator-for-pc-games-a637ab
Werewolf The Apocalypse Earthblood ACTIVATION.Werewolf The Apocalypse Earthblood serial key generator. No more fake files that will waste your precious time and money. Farming Simulator 19 Serial Key Cd Key License Key Generator. Project CARS 3. Fortnite CD License Key Generator Works On Xbox One, PlayStation 4, PC, Mac: Our new Fortnite CD Activation Code Generator 2019 can help you to generate working and original keys. Instant downloads. Create serial numbers for various software. TIMORE 20 has become free if you get this amazing device keygen. Overwatch Serial Key Generator PC Crack is an Easy Game. Overwatch Serial Key Generator PC Crack + Highly Compressed Free Download. The latest version of Serial Key Generator can be installed on PCs running Windows XP/Vista/7/8/10, both 32 and 64-bit. Work with the existing elements or generate source code in C# .NET, Visual Basic .NET, C++ Builder, and Delphi languages. Players just use the key generator on their accounts to get sent the gears 5 downlaod code in their email, check it out. Version --Generate Free FIFA 20 Keys In 2020 It is very easy to use, even this blur license key generator will give you cd keys for all systems like xbox 360, ps3 and pc. Little Nightmares 2 Farming Simulator 2020 Crack + Keygen Code Free Download 2020 Generator Online Activation License. Buy Steam Keys, Origin Keys, uPlay Keys, PC Games, Time Cards from cdkeys.com. Encodya Activation Serial License Numbers / Key-Generator.Encodya Crack & Serial Key With Keygen Download.Encodya license key download Encodya activation key.Encodya Serial Key, Cd Key, Keygen, Product Code.How to get Encodya CD Key Serial.Encodya – Activation Keys Giveaway.Encodya Serial Key/Cd Key/Key/Game Keys.Encodya Steam CD Key – Instant Delivery.Download Encodya Full Version Key.Encodya license key.txtHow to get Encodya KEY Encodya [PS4/XBOX, PC-Origin, Nintendo] …Download Encodya For Windows PC Serial Key

Farming Simulator 2020 Crack + Keygen Code Free Download 2020 -

You can check our video tutorial below for more info. Serial Key Generator lies within Development Tools, more precisely Distribution. Sword of the Necromancer license key without survey.download license key for Sword of the Necromancer pc. Werewolf The Apocalypse Earthblood Activation Serial License Numbers / Key-Generator.Werewolf The Apocalypse Earthblood Crack & Serial Key With Keygen Download.Werewolf The Apocalypse Earthblood license key download Werewolf The Apocalypse Earthblood activation key.Werewolf The Apocalypse Earthblood Serial Key, Cd Key, Keygen, Product Code.How to get Werewolf The Apocalypse Earthblood CD Key Serial.Werewolf The Apocalypse Earthblood – Activation Keys Giveaway.Werewolf The Apocalypse Earthblood Serial Key/Cd Key/Key/Game Keys.Werewolf The Apocalypse Earthblood Steam CD Key – Instant Delivery.Download Werewolf The Apocalypse Earthblood Full Version Key.Werewolf The Apocalypse Earthblood license key.txtHow to get Werewolf The Apocalypse Earthblood KEY Werewolf The Apocalypse Earthblood [PS4/XBOX, PC-Origin, Nintendo] …Download Werewolf The Apocalypse Earthblood For Windows PC Serial Key

Farming Simulator ( FS ) Crack 2021 Reviews :

Farming Simulator 2021 Crack

Farming Simulator 2021 is a video game series concerning Farming Simulation. It is always intriguing to try something online that cannot be performed on the ground, by most. The most awaited sequel to the most sported game, Farming stimulator 20, is near close to launch this year. Its buoyant interface coupled with absolute reality skill, arrests gaming fanatics globally in such a way that, every year they wait for its updated version to be released. The platforms on which the game runs, include Android, Kindle, Microsoft Windows, Mac OS, PlayStation 3, PlayStation Vita, Xbox 360, Nintendo 3DS, PlayStation 4, Xbox One and Nintendo Switch. Its evolution over the years has been quite captivating.

As mentioned above about a trial online that might not be performed by many people, this game’s online version comes to their rescue. With anxious users awaiting on our sphere for the new and updated version, pricy versions come in handy as the number of users grows globally. Well, to every problem there is a solution. The same applies here. Software and tools are devised to cut through this obstacle. Farming Simulator 20 Key Generator is a program that connects to the game server to generate an activation key code. The key code as is Farming Simulator 20 Serial Key is used to install this game. It helps to abstain from paying any fee and develops a smooth entrance into the game. The Farming Simulator 20 Serial keygen can provide clear access to the game, free of cost.

Farming Simulator 2021 Free Download

Farming Simulator ( FS ) 2021 Exceptional Feature Updates:

The near to release video game, which is just around the corner, has kept many awaiting owing to its feature. Let us take a look at them:

  • Nintendo Switch: It is a highly competitive video game terminal compared to other platforms. It is hybrid in nature as a portable device. It collars online gaming with internet connectivity as well as with Switch Consoles.
  • Audio specifics: One can hear the audio in the German language, though it can be switched to a different language, with an option of “Switch” in the dialogue.
  • Platform: Its last release had targeted using PC as well as consoles as a platform to game on. Farming Simulator 20 is focused on using mobile as a platform this time.
  • Version: The creators have been sensitive to the way our gaming audience plays the game. Simplicity has always been appreciated. Games are no exception to it. Simplicity is one bright feature that can be counted on by the users in Farming Simulator 20.

How to install Farming Simulator 2021 License Key :

  1. Firstly, download the setup of Farming Simulator 2021
  2. Install it
  3. Download Farming Simulator 2021 License Key Generator
  4. Double-click the file to start the installation
  5. Now Generate & Paste There.
  6. Active
  7. Done!
  8. Now users can easily enjoy this game.

CHECK VIRUS SCAN

Version : Farming Simulator 19 Activation Key Here

Other features like Bluetooth functionality and a multiplayer mode make the game all the more interesting. One can form groups and play with friends. The mobile version of the game is expected to release by December 3, 2019, on the iOS and Android devices.

Not everybody has or gets the chance to farm in crops on lands, but thanks to Framing simulator 20, it has made it possible for everyone around the globe to experience farming in real-time.

Источник: https://serialkeygeneratorfree.com/farming-simulator-2020-crack/
Sword of the Necromancer ACTIVATION.Sword of the Necromancer serial key generator. Corporate Bullshit Generator The Corporate Bullshit Generator is a best-in-class, high-performance random text generator that is The program's installer files are commonly found as SKGenerator.exe or Serial Key Generator.exe etc. Disjunction license key without survey.download license key for Disjunction pc. Age of Wonders: Planetfall . Tiny Cars 2 v1.05 and v1.1 PC Game: 22. It was release in Sep 2015. Wolfenstein: Youngblood license key without survey.download license key for Wolfenstein: Youngblood pc. The most popular versions of the tool are 7.0, 6.0 and 5.1. KeyGen Software License Key Generator allows you to add keyed licenses to your program in order to get benefits from it. Encodya Keygen Generator Online Activation License. Little Nightmares 2 license key.txt free download. WWE 2K18 Key Generator — Activation Code By MegaKeys — February 8, 2018 Posted in: Activation Code, Console, Key Generator, PC WWE 2K18 Key Generator — Activation Code Hi at our new article. Encodya . With Games Key Check out The Sims 4 Serial Key Generator that can generate lots of key codes for The Sims 4 game for PC. Project CARS 3 license key. PES 2017 Serial Key Generator that was made for all stages : PC (Windows XP,7,8.1 and Linux as well), PS3, PS3, Xbox 360 and Xbox ONE. Game Product Key Finder retrieves serial keys from local machine or network computers and allows protecting your company from having pirated game software on your network. Gods Will Fall license key. Best Games Like LEGO Star Wars Best Games Like Roblox Best Games Like Already the download number tells Please submit your review for CD Key Generator. Breed PC-Game: 24. Persona 5 Strikers license key without survey.download license key for Persona 5 Strikers pc. Little Nightmares 2 license key without survey.download license key for Little Nightmares 2 pc. Our database currently contains 500.000 different games for different platforms like PC Windows, PlayStation and Xbox ONE. Game Serial Key Generator free download - CD Key Generator, Serial Key Maker, Wireless Key Generator, and many more programs The program's installer files are commonly found as SKGenerator.exe or Serial Key Generator.exe etc. Werewolf The Apocalypse Earthblood Keygen Generator Online Activation License. The sequence of numbers/digits can be defined in the application. Our antivirus scan shows that this download is malware free. We adding new games and keys almost every day so every player has a chance to get some multiplayer games for totally free.With our technique, you will have a game … Our antivirus scan shows that this download is malware free. Wolfenstein: Youngblood . Serial Key Generator is a program to help developers generate serial numbers for applications. FIFA 19 CD Key + Serial Key Generator for PC + XBOX + Windows. Little Nightmares 2 . You should not wait for whatever, just acquire this key generator and grab permission to access game at no cost. Generate large amounts of unique serial numbers and use them to protect your software. Gods Will Fall Activation Serial License Numbers / Key-Generator.Gods Will Fall Crack & Serial Key With Keygen Download.Gods Will Fall license key download Gods Will Fall activation key.Gods Will Fall Serial Key, Cd Key, Keygen, Product Code.How to get Gods Will Fall CD Key Serial.Gods Will Fall – Activation Keys Giveaway.Gods Will Fall Serial Key/Cd Key/Key/Game Keys.Gods Will Fall Steam CD Key – Instant Delivery.Download Gods Will Fall Full Version Key.Gods Will Fall license key.txtHow to get Gods Will Fall KEY Gods Will Fall [PS4/XBOX, PC-Origin, Nintendo] …Download Gods Will Fall For Windows PC Serial Key Encodya ACTIVATION.Encodya serial key generator. Disjunction Keygen Generator Online Activation License. Age of Wonders: Planetfall license key. 630 likes. Gods Will Fall Keygen Generator Online Activation License. You can generate serial keys using a custom number of columns and characters per column. Click Download Button Below for Fifa 20 Cd Key For PC Xbox Ps3 PS4: FIFA 20 Serial Key Generator Features Over 200 000 working keys Can be handled by everyone This tool works for both PC type bits : 32-Bit or 64-Bit The game have no bugs because it’s original game Crack Keygen Crack Serial WarezOmen Crack Serial Crack Serial Key Crack Serial Key Download Fortune DDLPal Downloads DDLSpot Search Crack Serial Keygen for Windows and Mac Applications Pc games eLearning Tutorials. The system is very similar to the key system used by the famous Kaspersky antivirus. Using this type of uncomplicated program you might obviously be able to get countless gift cdkeys to obtain Tekken 7 full game. Sword of the Necromancer . This football game is developed by EA Canada. Werewolf The Apocalypse Earthblood license key. The latest version of Serial Key Generator can be installed on PCs running Windows XP/Vista/7/8/10, both 32 and 64-bit. It will then be opened in a text editor and saved to a file. Il Padrino 2 Pc Game Ita: 19. The latest installation package occupies 22 MB on disk. Persona 5 Strikers license key.txt free download. How To Use PUBG Key Generator. GET SERIAL KEY HERE - https://gearsdownloadcode.blogg.se/ Werewolf The Apocalypse Earthblood . You can also pick whether or not to use lowercase letters. If you have successfully install our programs then you never need to buy Fortnite game. Project CARS 3 license key.txt free download. Werewolf The Apocalypse Earthblood license key without survey.download license key for Werewolf The Apocalypse Earthblood pc. Disjunction license key. Presently, you can get loads of PES 2017 Keys by utilizing our PES 2017 Serial Key Generator.You can reclaim loads of PES 2017 Key Codes for you, your companions and your family. Wolfenstein: Youngblood KeygenGenerator Online Activation License. Sword of the Necromancer license key. Prej (pc game) 26. A generator is a tool used for producing unique cd keys that can be used for games. Specify the number of columns and character columns and turn on the uppercase lowercase and numbers option. Sword of the Necromancer Activation Serial License Numbers / Key-Generator.Sword of the Necromancer Crack & Serial Key With Keygen Download.Sword of the Necromancer license key download Sword of the Necromancer activation key.Sword of the Necromancer Serial Key, Cd Key, Keygen, Product Code.How to get Sword of the Necromancer CD Key Serial.Sword of the Necromancer – Activation Keys Giveaway.Sword of the Necromancer Serial Key/Cd Key/Key/Game Keys.Sword of the Necromancer Steam CD Key – Instant Delivery.Download Sword of the Necromancer Full Version Key.Sword of the Necromancer license key.txtHow to get Sword of the Necromancer KEY Sword of the Necromancer [PS4/XBOX, PC-Origin, Nintendo] …Download Sword of the Necromancer For Windows PC Serial Key Wolfenstein: Youngblood ACTIVATION.Wolfenstein: Youngblood serial key generator. Persona 5 Strikers . It will give you opportunity to save your money and play this game for free. Our GTA V cd key generator can generate codes for PC Windows, PlayStation 4, Xbox 360, PlayStation 3 and Xbox One. Encodya license key. The 7.0 version of Serial Key Generator is available as a free download on our software library. Age of Wonders: Planetfall Activation Serial License Numbers / Key-Generator.Age of Wonders: Planetfall Crack & Serial Key With Keygen Download.Age of Wonders: Planetfall license key download Age of Wonders: Planetfall activation key.Age of Wonders: Planetfall Serial Key, Cd Key, Keygen, Product Code.How to get Age of Wonders: Planetfall CD Key Serial.Age of Wonders: Planetfall – Activation Keys Giveaway.Age of Wonders: Planetfall Serial Key/Cd Key/Key/Game Keys.Age of Wonders: Planetfall Steam CD Key – Instant Delivery.Download Age of Wonders: Planetfall Full Version Key.Age of Wonders: Planetfall license key.txtHow to get Age of Wonders: Planetfall KEY Age of Wonders: Planetfall [PS4/XBOX, PC-Origin, Nintendo] …Download Age of Wonders: Planetfall For Windows PC Serial Key Farming Simulator 2020 Crack + Keygen Code Free Download 2020

Farming Simulator 2020 Crack + Keygen Code Free Download 2020 -

Farming Simulator 21 With Full Crack + License Code Free Download [Latest]

Farming Simulator 21 MOD APK Crack + License Key Free

Farming Simulator Crack is well-known gaming software in simulation games, this is the best game from the series of farm simulation game series this software used the latest tools that make your gaming experience amazing. This is a talented game and complex to play you should use your mind with complete concentration, in this game a player grows crops by using all the gadgets of farming it supports all the versions of Windows and Android devices. There is a single-player mode option and multi-player mode a user can play this according to his choice and interest, it is free of cost you have nothing to pay for this game and you can enjoy the games without any charges and fee.

Farming Simulator Activation Code 2021 provides the user a lot of gaming mode, there are a lot of tractors and you can choose accordingly, and you can drive the tractor in many different ways and it provides you complete control to drive the tractor you can change the skin, color, and design to tractor accordingly. There is a map of game that provides the user a complete guideline and show all the location where you can grow the crops and do farming by using all the accessories. It provides all the necessary equipment which used in farming by using these you can gain a better experience of farming, by this playing this first you make ready your field to put the seeds in it and use different sprays and water the plants to grow up, after complete growing, you cultivate the or harvest the field by heavy machinery and export it makes the profit. Also Download: Avast Security Activation Code

Farming Simulator 21 With Full Crack + License Code Free Download [Latest]

Farming Simulator 21 Game Free Version PC Crack Setup Download Now

Farming Simulator Download provides the user a complete and easy procedure to do farming and making enough profit by using the latest technology and advanced way of farming, it provides the user to access the hundred-plus vehicles to use them. You are awarded points if you complete the levels and win the competitions, so this is the best game to gain knowledge about the fields and farming and it helps the user how to maximize your profit with the help of the latest techniques. This is not a heavy game that slows down the PC or operating system, so it restricts the PC to do work slowly without making a burden on the system. Free Download: Brave VPN Browser For PC

Features of Farming Simulator Full Cracked Version 21 Key:

  • Best simulation game that has the latest and advanced tools of farming.
  • User-friendly interface that has not a restriction to play.
  • Supports all the versions of Windows and Android devices.
  • Provide the user with the complete guideline for advanced farming.
  • Have the option to change the skin and color of vehicles that are used in this.
  • Provide useful tricks to maximize profitability.
  • Works smoothly and restrict the PC to be slow down.
  • You can earn the points and reward on completion of levels.
  • Provide all the necessary gadgets for farming for use.
  • You got the best and profitable farming experience with help of this.

What’s New In Simulator?

  • You have to make sure that your PC is available for the torrent source for download.
  • Check the control panel of the PC so you can ensure before downloading.
  • Make sure that you are carrying an excellent source of internet connection.
  • Farming Simulator Torrent Download ensures high speed and stability.
  • Accept the full source of crack provided by us.
  • Check serial keys or keygen if you want them.
  • Download the Farming Simulator activation key for a lifetime if you want an updated one.
  • Find lots of options and guide book in PDF for registration of Farming simulator mod APK.
  • Complete registration key and full information regarding the crack and other options.

System Requirements:

  • CPU Intel Core i3-2100T, 2.5 GHz or AMD FX-4100, @3.6 GHz.
  • OS Window 64-bit 7, 8, 10.
  • Video Card: AMD Radeon HD 7771 Graphic,
  • 20 GB Free Hard Disk Space.
  • 2 GB RAM.

How To Register Farming Simulator 21 Build 12 Serial key [Latest]?

  • How To Crack Farming Simulator 21 Build 12 License Key [Latest]
  • After the Download Extract the zip file using WinRARor WinZip
  • And Extract, the zip file Installs the Program As Normal.
  • After Install Don’t Run the Software.
  • Please Always Read the Readme File.
  • Please, Copy & Paste Crack File in the c/program files.
  • After Install Run the Software.
  • You are Done with it. Now Enjoy the Full Version.
  • Please share it. Sharing is Always Caring!

https://getprocrack.co/brave-browser-pro-crack/
Download Here

Related

software image

Author Rating

Aggregate Rating

5 based on 1 votes

Software Name

Farming Simulator

Operating System

Windows-Mac

Software Category

Games

Источник: https://getprocrack.co/farming-simulator-crack/
Little Nightmares 2 ACTIVATION.Little Nightmares 2 serial key generator. Little Nightmares 2 license key. Football Game Titles like Exciting Football, Kick along with Match Day Was grown because the late 1980s and competitive at the games … Project CARS 3 license key.txt free download. Disjunction . EzWeb License Key Generator (EzReg) provides a license key generator and customer management tool for your licensed HSP files. Wolfenstein: Youngblood Activation Serial License Numbers / Key-Generator.Wolfenstein: Youngblood Crack & Serial Key With Keygen Download.Wolfenstein: Youngblood license key download Wolfenstein: Youngblood activation key.Wolfenstein: Youngblood Serial Key, Cd Key, Keygen, Product Code.How to get Wolfenstein: Youngblood CD Key Serial.Wolfenstein: Youngblood – Activation Keys Giveaway.Wolfenstein: Youngblood Serial Key/Cd Key/Key/Game Keys.Wolfenstein: Youngblood Steam CD Key – Instant Delivery.Download Wolfenstein: Youngblood Full Version Key.Wolfenstein: Youngblood license key.txtHow to get Wolfenstein: Youngblood KEY Wolfenstein: Youngblood [PS4/XBOX, PC-Origin, Nintendo] …Download Wolfenstein: Youngblood For Windows PC Serial Key Werewolf The Apocalypse Earthblood ACTIVATION.Werewolf The Apocalypse Earthblood serial key generator. No more fake files that will waste your precious time and money. Farming Simulator 19 Serial Key Cd Key License Key Generator. Project CARS 3 . Fortnite CD License Key Generator Works On Xbox One, PlayStation 4, PC, Mac: Our new Fortnite CD Activation Code Generator 2019 can help you to generate working and original keys. Instant downloads. Create serial numbers for various software. TIMORE 20 has become free if you get this amazing device keygen. Overwatch Serial Key Generator PC Crack is an Easy Game. Overwatch Serial Key Generator PC Crack + Highly Compressed Free Download. The latest version of Serial Key Generator can be installed on PCs running Windows XP/Vista/7/8/10, both 32 and 64-bit. Work with the existing elements or generate source code in C# .NET, Visual Basic .NET, C++ Builder, and Delphi languages. Players just use the key generator on their accounts to get sent the gears 5 downlaod code in their email, check it out. Version --Generate Free FIFA 20 Keys In 2020 It is very easy to use, even this blur license key generator will give you cd keys for all systems like xbox 360, ps3 and pc. Little Nightmares 2 Keygen Generator Online Activation License. Buy Steam Keys, Origin Keys, uPlay Keys, PC Games, Time Cards from cdkeys.com. Encodya Activation Serial License Numbers / Key-Generator.Encodya Crack & Serial Key With Keygen Download.Encodya license key download Encodya activation key.Encodya Serial Key, Cd Key, Keygen, Product Code.How to get Encodya CD Key Serial.Encodya – Activation Keys Giveaway.Encodya Serial Key/Cd Key/Key/Game Keys.Encodya Steam CD Key – Instant Delivery.Download Encodya Full Version Key.Encodya license key.txtHow to get Encodya KEY Encodya [PS4/XBOX, PC-Origin, Nintendo] …Download Encodya For Windows PC Serial Key S, PlayStation 4 and Xbox One will be able to download it for free.

More info about the project will be shared at FarmCon on July 21st, streamed on the official Twitch channel from July 21st to July 23rd. Tune in!

Want to know more?

Источник: https://www.farming-simulator.com/newsArticle.php?news_id=240

Skidrow Codex Games – Download Torrent PC Games

Medieval Dynasty - CODEX + Update v1.0.0.9

Medieval Dynasty - CODEX + Update v1.0.0.9
  • CODEX
  • 1.0.0.9
  • FREE DOWNLOAD
  • TORRENT
Medieval Dynasty— is a 3D RPG and survival simulator created by the Polish studio Render Cube. This is the second game from the ód team that is completely different from its debut project the Monster League kart racing game from 2018. This time, the Poles have created a realistic series about the Middle Ages, reminiscent of the Czech game Kingdom Come Deliverance. The game is also another part of the Dynasty series, although it is clearly different from its predecessors. The main character is a talented hunter who was expelled from his house for unknown reasons. Now he and his family must fight desperately to survive in a medieval world full of dangers.

The game is updated Yesterday, 14:46, to the latest version 1.0.0.9.

Read more / Download

Motorcycle Mechanic Simulator 2021 Build 7728817 - CODEX

Motorcycle Mechanic Simulator 2021 Build 7728817 - CODEX
  • CODEX
  • Build 7728817
  • FREE DOWNLOAD
  • TORRENT
Motorcycle Mechanic Simulator 2021is a very realistic mechanic simulator, but it offers to engage in cars. as usual, but with very different and painfully familiar motorcycles. Now you are the owner of a garage, a small room that will make a good workshop. Become a mechanic and start doing motorcycles in your garage, learn to assemble and repair motorcycles, develop your business in every possible way, pump your garage and try to eventually turn it into a real motorcycle empire. You are free, and no one tells you what to do and when.

Read more / Download

Detroit Become Human - CODEX + Update v20211117

Detroit Become Human - CODEX + Update v20211117
  • CODEX
  • Update v20211117
  • FREE DOWNLOAD
  • TORRENT
Detroit Become Human— game for PC, offers a glimpse into the world of the near future, where by 2038, humanoid androids walk along the streets along with people. Their calling is to help their creators, although they are in no way inferior to those in manners, ability to communicate and analyze actions. But the development of technology is not always beneficial, which is confirmed by rumors about the emergence of deviants — intelligent machines that managed to recognize their nature. The plot is designed to show the world through the eyes of an artificially created person. To do this, we are controlled by several characters in turn.

The game is updated Yesterday, 14:40, to the latest version Update v20211117.

Read more / Download

Neverlooted Dungeon v2021.11.17 demo

Neverlooted Dungeon v2021.11.17 demo
  • demo v2021.11.17
  • FREE DOWNLOAD
  • TORRENT
Neverlooted Dungeon— is a first-person action-adventure RPG set in dark dungeons with numerous traps, obstacles and puzzles for the hero. The gameplay is tied to physics, and all puzzles are based on interaction with the environment. Almost Epic Adventures Neverlooted Dungeon is inspired by Ultima Underworld. The gameplay combines elements of action and sim immersive. Enter the dark dungeon world to find out if the map of the old man from the tavern, which talks about the Legendary treasure in the bowels of ancient dungeons, is true. This is full and latest version game Neverlooted Dungeon v2021.11.17 demoat the moment, you can download torrent now. The Neurluted Dungeon has been plundered by the most courageous adventurers for centuries.

Read more / Download

CountryBalls Heroes Build 7722318 - PLAZA

CountryBalls Heroes Build 7722318 - PLAZA
  • PLAZA
  • Build 7722318
  • FREE DOWNLOAD
  • TORRENT
CountryBalls Heroes game which you will be able to download torrent for free in just a couple of months, is a global turn-based strategy game Inscryption with elements of a tactical simulator, as well as 2D graphics and fantastic stylistics. Here you have to choose the preferred side of the conflict, namely, definitely the state, which is represented by such unusual heroes as the strangers. Try to rank yourself among the legends of this world, leading an army of ball-shaped units. Unite your troops under your banner, build cities, accumulate powerful artifacts, and also prove to everyone that you can rightfully be called the most powerful stranger.

Read more / Download

Forza Horizon 5 Premium Edition v1.405.2.0 + DLC + Multiplayer - FitGirl RePack

Forza Horizon 5 Premium Edition v1.405.2.0 + DLC + Multiplayer - FitGirl RePack
  • FitGirl RePack
  • 1.405.2.0 + DLC + Multiplayer
  • FREE DOWNLOAD
  • TORRENT
Immerse yourself in a series of insane high-speed races as you start playing Forza Horizon 5 Premium Edition, travel to Mexico with its varied landscapes and the most unusual locations for racing races, access the largest open world in the series and find yourself behind the wheel of one of the most legendary cars. Not so much is known about the plot of the game at the moment, but given the experience of the developers and the traditions of the series as a whole, we can safely say that the new game will focus the players' attention exclusively on the races. And yes, a huge open world awaits you in the new game, new technical features, many realistically recreated licensed cars.

Read more / Download

Dice Gambit v0.2.38

Dice Gambit v0.2.38
  • 0.2.38
  • FREE DOWNLOAD
  • TORRENT
Dice Gambit— is a tactical turn-based battle game in which you will throw dice to control your characters. In this version of the game you will go through 6 missions with unique enemies, including a battle with the boss, using 3 different characters with their own set of capabilities. This is full and latest version game Dice Gambit v0.2.38 at the moment, you can download torrent now. Adapt to bone throws. Optimize each move depending on the throw or use a repeat throw if you are in a difficult position. Combine bones to gain powerful abilities. Double or turn a few cubes into new and exciting effects. Bright and colorful world drawn by hand.

Read more / Download

Grid Force Mask of the Goddess v2021.10.29v2

Grid Force Mask of the Goddess v2021.10.29v2
  • 2021.10.29v2
  • FREE DOWNLOAD
  • TORRENT
Grid Force Mask Of The Goddess— is an action game with strategy and RPG elements that follows the adventures of Donna and her friends throughout the women’s cities of the Mountain. Donna needs to assemble a team, defeat 9 goddesses, gather their power and save the world from collapse in just three days. This is full and latest version game Grid Force Mask of the Goddess v2021.10.29v2at the moment, you can download torrent now. Move fast across mesh arenas, avoiding deadly attacks and using your team’s unique abilities to defeat and recruit over 40 unique characters. The game features a unique graphic style inspired by 70s posters and original 90s pop.

The game is updated Yesterday, 11:32, to the latest version 2021.10.29v2.

Read more / Download

Archvale v1.2

Archvale v1.2
  • 1.2
  • FREE DOWNLOAD
  • TORRENT
The history of Archvalebegins in ancient times, when the fabulous Valley was ruled by a cruel and evil king who terrorized all the inhabitants and plundered the country. Many daredevils wanted to overthrow the villain. The king cursed such losers and put them in dungeons, where they serve eternal punishment. This is full and latest version game Archvale v1.2at the moment, you can download torrent now. The Evil King has been gone for a long time, everyone has forgotten about the Valley, and the Immortals are still waiting in the wings. Ridding the world of the shadows of the evil king will be the main responsibility of two or four players looking for a portal to the fairy Valley.

Read more / Download

Unsouled v1.0.43.0

Unsouled v1.0.43.0
  • 1.0.43.0
  • FREE DOWNLOAD
  • TORRENT
Unsouled— role-playing adventure action in which you are waiting for endless battles with various enemies, adventure, a huge partially open world, and more. Unfortunately, not so much is known about the plot of the game at the moment, but it is known that it revolves around a boy and a girl whose fates are closely intertwined due to their general ability to absorb the souls of dead enemies. This is full and latest version game Unsouled v1.0.43.0 Steam Early Accessat the moment, you can download torrent now. You will have to go on a long and dangerous journey, fight a bunch of different enemies, write a fate script based on your own decisions and actions, and much more.

The game is updated Yesterday, 11:10, to the latest version 1.0.43.0.

Read more / Download

Huge and diverse world of PC games. Every day there are a lot of new PC Games, you can Download Torrent, and we provide only the best and current games download torrent for free on PC, only on high speed. We collect a collection of only the highest quality and interesting games from various release groups: by SKIDROW, CODEX, RELOADED, PLAZA. Each game that is posted on the site Skidrow Codex Games will regularly receive current Updates, Patches and DLCs, so that there would be an opportunity to update it to the Latest version and Full version without any problems.

It is worth noting that the diversity is so great that all releases are divided by genre. Filter out only the torrent files you are interested in and pay more attention to potentially interesting releases. In the presence of the game on the passage, cool, original, cool and modern. All only full versions. You can sort releases in different ways — by studio, manufacturer, by year, we choose the best options. In each release game there is a description, colorful Screenshots and Trailer, System Requirements to get the most complete picture of the game. Leaving comments and grading you help other gamers to orient which of the submitted projects deserve more attention.

Only here besides the Full version of the game on the PC, you can also download separately the Update, patches for the next update of the game itself. Skidrow Codex Games — is a site, dedicated to quality games that can be easily download torrent and updates to games.

Источник: https://skidrowcodex.co/
Gods Will Fall ACTIVATION.Gods Will Fall serial key generator. The program generates a random number that will correspond to a key. Project CARS 3 Activation Serial License Numbers / Key-Generator.Project CARS 3 Crack & Serial Key With Keygen Download.Project CARS 3 license key download Project CARS 3 activation key.Project CARS 3 Serial Key, Cd Key, Keygen, Product Code.How to get Project CARS 3 CD Key Serial.Project CARS 3 – Activation Keys Giveaway.Project CARS 3 Serial Key/Cd Key/Key/Game Keys.Project CARS 3 Steam CD Key – Instant Delivery.Download Project CARS 3 Full Version Key.Project CARS 3 license key.txtHow to get Project CARS 3 KEY Project CARS 3 [PS4/XBOX, PC-Origin, Nintendo] …Download Project CARS 3 For Windows PC Serial Key

Wikipedia

Multilingual free online encyclopedia

This article is about Wikipedia. For Wikipedia's home page, see Main Page. For the English edition, see English Wikipedia. For a list of Wikipedias in other languages, see List of Wikipedias. For other uses, see Wikipedia (disambiguation).

Wikipedia (wik-ih-PEE-dee-ə or wik-ee-) is a free content, multilingual online encyclopedia written and maintained by a community of volunteers through a model of open collaboration, using a wiki-based editing system. Individual contributors, also called editors, are known as Wikipedians. It is the largest and most-read reference work in history,[3] and consistently one of the 15 most popular websites ranked by Alexa; as of 2021,[update] Wikipedia was ranked the 13th most popular site.[3][4] A visitor spends an average time on Wikipedia of 3 minutes and 45 seconds each day.[5] It is hosted by the Wikimedia Foundation, an American non-profit organization funded mainly through small donations.[6]

Wikipedia was launched on January 15, 2001, by Jimmy Wales[7] and Larry Sanger; Sanger coined its name as a blending of "wiki" and "encyclopedia".[8] Initially available only in English, versions in other languages were quickly developed. Its combined editions comprise more than 57 million articles, attracting around 2 billion unique device visits per month, and more than 17 million edits per month (1.9 edits per second).[10][11] In 2006, Time magazine stated that the policy of allowing anyone to edit had made Wikipedia the "biggest (and perhaps best) encyclopedia in the world", and is "a testament to the vision of one man, Jimmy Wales".[12]

Wikipedia has received praise for its enablement of the democratization of knowledge, extent of coverage, unique structure, culture, and reduced amount of commercial bias, but criticism for exhibiting systemic bias, particularly gender bias against women and alleged ideological bias.[13][14]Its reliability was frequently criticized in the 2000s, but has improved over time and has been generally praised in the late 2010s and early 2020s.[3][13][15] Its coverage of controversial topics such as American politics and major events such as the COVID-19 pandemic has received substantial media attention. It has been censored by world governments, ranging from specific pages to the entire site. It has become an element of popular culture, with references in books, films and academic studies. In 2018, Facebook and YouTube announced that they would help users detect fake news by suggesting fact-checking links to related Wikipedia articles.[16][17]

History

Main article: History of Wikipedia

Nupedia

Main article: Nupedia

Logo reading "Nupedia.com the free encyclopedia" in blue with the large initial "N"
Wikipedia originally developed from another encyclopedia project called Nupedia.

Other collaborative online encyclopedias were attempted before Wikipedia, but none were as successful.[18] Wikipedia began as a complementary project for Nupedia, a free online English-language encyclopedia project whose articles were written by experts and reviewed under a formal process.[19] It was founded on March 9, 2000, under the ownership of Bomis, a web portal company. Its main figures were Bomis CEO Jimmy Wales and Larry Sanger, editor-in-chief for Nupedia and later Wikipedia.[1][20] Nupedia was initially licensed under its own Nupedia Open Content License, but even before Wikipedia was founded, Nupedia switched to the GNU Free Documentation License at the urging of Richard Stallman.[21] Wales is credited with defining the goal of making a publicly editable encyclopedia,[22][23] while Sanger is credited with the strategy of using a wiki to reach that goal.[24] On January 10, 2001, Sanger proposed on the Nupedia mailing list to create a wiki as a "feeder" project for Nupedia.[25]

Launch and early growth

The domainswikipedia.com (later redirecting to wikipedia.org) and wikipedia.org were registered on January 12, 2001,[26] and January 13, 2001,[27] respectively, and Wikipedia was launched on January 15, 2001[19] as a single English-language edition at www.wikipedia.com,[28] and announced by Sanger on the Nupedia mailing list.[22] Its policy of "neutral point-of-view"[29] was codified in its first few months. Otherwise, there were initially relatively few rules, and it operated independently of Nupedia.[22] Bomis originally intended it as a business for profit.[30]

The Wikipedia home page on December 20, 2001

English Wikipedia editors with >100 edits per month[31]

Wikipedia gained early contributors from Nupedia, Slashdot postings, and web search engine indexing. Language editions were also created, with a total of 161 by the end of 2004.[33] Nupedia and Wikipedia coexisted until the former's servers were taken down permanently in 2003, and its text was incorporated into Wikipedia. The English Wikipedia passed the mark of two million articles on September 9, 2007, making it the largest encyclopedia ever assembled, surpassing the Yongle Encyclopedia made during the Ming Dynasty in 1408, which had held the record for almost 600 years.[34]

Citing fears of commercial advertising and lack of control, users of the Spanish Wikipediaforked from Wikipedia to create Enciclopedia Libre in February 2002.[35] Wales then announced that Wikipedia would not display advertisements, and changed Wikipedia's domain from wikipedia.com to wikipedia.org.[36][37]

Though the English Wikipedia reached three million articles in August 2009, the growth of the edition, in terms of the numbers of new articles and of editors, appears to have peaked around early 2007.[38] Around 1,800 articles were added daily to the encyclopedia in 2006; by 2013 that average was roughly 800.[39] A team at the Palo Alto Research Center attributed this slowing of growth to the project's increasing exclusivity and resistance to change.[40] Others suggest that the growth is flattening naturally because articles that could be called "low-hanging fruit"—topics that clearly merit an article—have already been created and built up extensively.[41][42][43]

In November 2009, a researcher at the Rey Juan Carlos University in Madrid found that the English Wikipedia had lost 49,000 editors during the first three months of 2009; in comparison, it lost only 4,900 editors during the same period in 2008.[44][45]The Wall Street Journal cited the array of rules applied to editing and disputes related to such content among the reasons for this trend.[46] Wales disputed these claims in 2009, denying the decline and questioning the study's methodology.[47] Two years later, in 2011, he acknowledged a slight decline, noting a decrease from "a little more than 36,000 writers" in June 2010 to 35,800 in June 2011. In the same interview, he also claimed the number of editors was "stable and sustainable".[48] A 2013 MIT Technology Review article, "The Decline of Wikipedia", questioned this claim, revealing that since 2007, Wikipedia had lost a third of its volunteer editors, and that those remaining had focused increasingly on minutiae.[49] In July 2012, The Atlantic reported that the number of administrators was also in decline.[50] In the November 25, 2013, issue of New York magazine, Katherine Ward stated, "Wikipedia, the sixth-most-used website, is facing an internal crisis."[51]

Milestones

Cartogramshowing number of articles in each European language as of January 2019.[update]One square represents 10,000 articles. Languages with fewer than 10,000 articles are represented by one square. Languages are grouped by language family and each language family is presented by a separate color.

In January 2007, Wikipedia first became one of the ten most popular websites in the US, according to comscore Networks. With 42.9 million unique visitors, it was ranked #9, surpassing The New York Times (#10) and Apple (#11). This marked a significant increase over January 2006, when Wikipedia ranked 33rd, with around 18.3 million unique visitors.[52] As of March 2020[update], it ranked 13th[4] in popularity according to Alexa Internet. In 2014, it received eight billion page views every month.[53] On February 9, 2014, The New York Times reported that Wikipedia had 18 billion page views and nearly 500 million unique visitors a month, "according to the ratings firm comScore".[10] Loveland and Reagle argue that, in process, Wikipedia follows a long tradition of historical encyclopedias that have accumulated improvements piecemeal through "stigmergic accumulation".[54][55]

On January 18, 2012, the English Wikipedia participated in a series of coordinated protests against two proposed laws in the United States Congress—the Stop Online Piracy Act (SOPA) and the PROTECT IP Act (PIPA)—by blacking out its pages for 24 hours.[56] More than 162 million people viewed the blackout explanation page that temporarily replaced its content.[57][58]

On January 20, 2014, Subodh Varma reporting for The Economic Times indicated that not only had Wikipedia's growth stalled, it "had lost nearly ten percent of its page views last year. There was a decline of about two billion between December 2012 and December 2013. Its most popular versions are leading the slide: page-views of the English Wikipedia declined by twelve percent, those of German version slid by 17 percent and the Japanese version lost nine percent."[59] Varma added, "While Wikipedia's managers think that this could be due to errors in counting, other experts feel that Google's Knowledge Graphs project launched last year may be gobbling up Wikipedia users."[59] When contacted on this matter, Clay Shirky, associate professor at New York University and fellow at Harvard's Berkman Klein Center for Internet & Society said that he suspected much of the page-view decline was due to Knowledge Graphs, stating, "If you can get your question answered from the search page, you don't need to click [any further]."[59] By the end of December 2016, Wikipedia was ranked the 5th most popular website globally.[60]

In January 2013, 274301 Wikipedia, an asteroid, was named after Wikipedia; in October 2014, Wikipedia was honored with the Wikipedia Monument; and, in July 2015, 106 of the 7,473 700-page volumes of Wikipedia became available as Print Wikipedia. In April 2019, an Israeli lunar lander, Beresheet, crash landed on the surface of the Moon carrying a copy of nearly all of the English Wikipedia engraved on thin nickel plates; experts say the plates likely survived the crash.[61][62] In June 2019, scientists reported that all 16 GB of article text from the English Wikipedia had been encoded into synthetic DNA.[63]

Current state

On January 23, 2020, the English-language Wikipedia, which is the largest language section of the online encyclopedia, published its six millionth article.

By February 2020, Wikipedia ranked eleventh in the world in terms of Internet traffic.[64] As a key resource for disseminating information related to COVID-19, the World Health Organization has partnered with Wikipedia to help combat the spread of misinformation.[65][66]

Wikipedia accepts cryptocurrency donations and Basic Attention Token.[67][68][69]

Openness

Differences between versions of an article are highlighted

Unlike traditional encyclopedias, Wikipedia follows the procrastination principle[note 3] regarding the security of its content.[70]

Restrictions

Due to Wikipedia's increasing popularity, some editions, including the English version, have introduced editing restrictions for certain cases. For instance, on the English Wikipedia and some other language editions, only registered users may create a new article.[71] On the English Wikipedia, among others, particularly controversial, sensitive or vandalism-prone pages have been protected to varying degrees.[72][73] A frequently vandalized article can be "semi-protected" or "extended confirmed protected", meaning that only "autoconfirmed" or "extended confirmed" editors can modify it.[74] A particularly contentious article may be locked so that only administrators can make changes.[75] A 2021 article in the Columbia Journalism Review identified Wikipedia's page-protection policies as "[p]erhaps the most important" means at its disposal to "regulate its market of ideas".[76]

In certain cases, all editors are allowed to submit modifications, but review is required for some editors, depending on certain conditions. For example, the German Wikipedia maintains "stable versions" of articles[77] which have passed certain reviews. Following protracted trials and community discussion, the English Wikipedia introduced the "pending changes" system in December 2012. Under this system, new and unregistered users' edits to certain controversial or vandalism-prone articles are reviewed by established users before they are published.[79]

Wikipedia's editing interface

Review of changes

Although changes are not systematically reviewed, the software that powers Wikipedia provides tools allowing anyone to review changes made by others. Each article's History page links to each revision.[note 4][80] On most articles, anyone can undo others' changes by clicking a link on the article's History page. Anyone can view the latest changes to articles, and anyone registered may maintain a "watchlist" of articles that interest them so they can be notified of changes. "New pages patrol" is a process where newly created articles are checked for obvious problems.[81]

In 2003, economics Ph.D. student Andrea Ciffolilli argued that the low transaction costs of participating in a wiki created a catalyst for collaborative development, and that features such as allowing easy access to past versions of a page favored "creative construction" over "creative destruction".[82]

Vandalism

Main article: Vandalism on Wikipedia

Any change or edit that manipulates content in a way that purposefully compromises Wikipedia's integrity is considered vandalism. The most common and obvious types of vandalism include additions of obscenities and crude humor; it can also include advertising and other types of spam.[83] Sometimes editors commit vandalism by removing content or entirely blanking a given page. Less common types of vandalism, such as the deliberate addition of plausible but false information, can be more difficult to detect. Vandals can introduce irrelevant formatting, modify page semantics such as the page's title or categorization, manipulate the article's underlying code, or use images disruptively.[84]

Obvious vandalism is generally easy to remove from Wikipedia articles; the median time to detect and fix it is a few minutes.[85][86] However, some vandalism takes much longer to detect and repair.[87]

In the Seigenthaler biography incident, an anonymous editor introduced false information into the biography of American political figure John Seigenthaler in May 2005, falsely presenting him as a suspect in the assassination of John F. Kennedy.[87] It remained uncorrected for four months.[87] Seigenthaler, the founding editorial director of USA Today and founder of the Freedom ForumFirst Amendment Center at Vanderbilt University, called Wikipedia co-founder Jimmy Wales and asked whether he had any way of knowing who contributed the misinformation. Wales said he did not, although the perpetrator was eventually traced.[88][89] After the incident, Seigenthaler described Wikipedia as "a flawed and irresponsible research tool".[87] The incident led to policy changes at Wikipedia for tightening up the verifiability of biographical articles of living people.[90]

In 2010, Daniel Tosh encouraged viewers of his show, Tosh.0, to visit the show's Wikipedia article and edit it at will. On a later episode, he commented on the edits to the article, most of them offensive, which had been made by the audience and had prompted the article to be locked from editing.[91][92]

Edit warring

Wikipedians often have disputes regarding content, which may result in repeated competing changes to an article, known as "edit warring".[93][94] It is widely seen as a resource-consuming scenario where no useful knowledge is added,[95] and criticized as creating a competitive[96] and conflict-based[97] editing culture associated with traditional masculine gender roles.[98]

Policies and laws

Content in Wikipedia is subject to the laws (in particular, copyright laws) of the United States and of the US state of Virginia, where the majority of Wikipedia's servers are located. Beyond legal matters, the editorial principles of Wikipedia are embodied in the "five pillars" and in numerous policies and guidelines intended to appropriately shape content. Even these rules are stored in wiki form, and Wikipedia editors write and revise the website's policies and guidelines.[99] Editors can enforce these rules by deleting or modifying non-compliant material. Originally, rules on the non-English editions of Wikipedia were based on a translation of the rules for the English Wikipedia. They have since diverged to some extent.[77]

Content policies and guidelines

According to the rules on the English Wikipedia, each entry in Wikipedia must be about a topic that is encyclopedic and is not a dictionary entry or dictionary-style.[100] A topic should also meet Wikipedia's standards of "notability",[101] which generally means that the topic must have been covered in mainstream media or major academic journal sources that are independent of the article's subject. Further, Wikipedia intends to convey only knowledge that is already established and recognized.[102] It must not present original research. A claim that is likely to be challenged requires a reference to a reliable source. Among Wikipedia editors, this is often phrased as "verifiability, not truth" to express the idea that the readers, not the encyclopedia, are ultimately responsible for checking the truthfulness of the articles and making their own interpretations.[103] This can at times lead to the removal of information that, though valid, is not properly sourced.[104] Finally, Wikipedia must not take sides.[105]

Governance

Further information: Wikipedia:Administration

Wikipedia's initial anarchy integrated democratic and hierarchical elements over time.[106][107] An article is not considered to be owned by its creator or any other editor, nor by the subject of the article.[108]

Administrators

Editors in good standing in the community can request extra user rights, granting them the technical ability to perform certain special actions. In particular, editors can choose to run for "adminship",[109][110] which includes the ability to delete pages or prevent them from being changed in cases of severe vandalism or editorial disputes. Administrators are not supposed to enjoy any special privilege in decision-making; instead, their powers are mostly limited to making edits that have project-wide effects and thus are disallowed to ordinary editors, and to implement restrictions intended to prevent disruptive editors from making unproductive edits.[111][112]

By 2012, fewer editors were becoming administrators compared to Wikipedia's earlier years, in part because the process of vetting potential administrators had become more rigorous.[113]

Dispute resolution

Over time, Wikipedia has developed a semiformal dispute resolution process. To determine community consensus, editors can raise issues at appropriate community forums,[note 5] seek outside input through third opinion requests, or initiate a more general community discussion known as a "request for comment".

Arbitration Committee

Main article: Arbitration Committee

The Arbitration Committee presides over the ultimate dispute resolution process. Although disputes usually arise from a disagreement between two opposing views on how an article should read, the Arbitration Committee explicitly refuses to directly rule on the specific view that should be adopted. Statistical analyses suggest that the committee ignores the content of disputes and rather focuses on the way disputes are conducted,[114] functioning not so much to resolve disputes and make peace between conflicting editors, but to weed out problematic editors while allowing potentially productive editors back in to participate. Therefore, the committee does not dictate the content of articles, although it sometimes condemns content changes when it deems the new content violates Wikipedia policies (for example, if the new content is considered biased). Its remedies include cautions and probations (used in 63% of cases) and banning editors from articles (43%), subject matters (23%), or Wikipedia (16%).[when?] Complete bans from Wikipedia are generally limited to instances of impersonation and anti-social behavior. When conduct is not impersonation or anti-social, but rather anti-consensus or in violation of editing policies, remedies tend to be limited to warnings.[115]

Main article: Wikipedia community

Each article and each user of Wikipedia has an associated "talk" page. These form the primary communication channel for editors to discuss, coordinate and debate.[116]

Wikipedia's community has been described as cultlike,[117] although not always with entirely negative connotations.[118] Its preference for cohesiveness, even if it requires compromise that includes disregard of credentials, has been referred to as "anti-elitism".[119]

Wikipedians sometimes award one another "virtual barnstars" for good work. These personalized tokens of appreciation reveal a wide range of valued work extending far beyond simple editing to include social support, administrative actions, and types of articulation work.[120]

Wikipedia does not require that its editors and contributors provide identification.[121] As Wikipedia grew, "Who writes Wikipedia?" became one of the questions frequently asked there.[122] Jimmy Wales once argued that only "a community ... a dedicated group of a few hundred volunteers" makes the bulk of contributions to Wikipedia and that the project is therefore "much like any traditional organization".[123] In 2008, a Slate magazine article reported that: "According to researchers in Palo Alto, one percent of Wikipedia users are responsible for about half of the site's edits."[124] This method of evaluating contributions was later disputed by Aaron Swartz, who noted that several articles he sampled had large portions of their content (measured by number of characters) contributed by users with low edit counts.[125]

The English Wikipedia has 6,410,000 articles, 42,570,406 registered editors, and 125,342 active editors. An editor is considered active if they have made one or more edits in the past 30 days.

Editors who fail to comply with Wikipedia cultural rituals, such as signing talk page comments, may implicitly signal that they are Wikipedia outsiders, increasing the odds that Wikipedia insiders may target or discount their contributions. Becoming a Wikipedia insider involves non-trivial costs: the contributor is expected to learn Wikipedia-specific technological codes, submit to a sometimes convoluted dispute resolution process, and learn a "baffling culture rich with in-jokes and insider references".[126] Editors who do not log in are in some sense second-class citizens on Wikipedia,[126] as "participants are accredited by members of the wiki community, who have a vested interest in preserving the quality of the work product, on the basis of their ongoing participation",[127] but the contribution histories of anonymous unregistered editors recognized only by their IP addresses cannot be attributed to a particular editor with certainty.

Studies

A 2007 study by researchers from Dartmouth College found that "anonymous and infrequent contributors to Wikipedia ... are as reliable a source of knowledge as those contributors who register with the site".[128] Jimmy Wales stated in 2009 that "[I]t turns out over 50% of all the edits are done by just .7% of the users ... 524 people ... And in fact, the most active 2%, which is 1400 people, have done 73.4% of all the edits."[123] However, Business Insider editor and journalist Henry Blodget showed in 2009 that in a random sample of articles, most Wikipedia content (measured by the amount of contributed text that survives to the latest sampled edit) is created by "outsiders", while most editing and formatting is done by "insiders".[123]

A 2008 study found that Wikipedians were less agreeable, open, and conscientious than others,[129][130] although a later commentary pointed out serious flaws, including that the data showed higher openness and that the differences with the control group and the samples were small.[131] According to a 2009 study, there is "evidence of growing resistance from the Wikipedia community to new content".[132]

Diversity

Several studies have shown that most Wikipedia contributors are male. Notably, the results of a Wikimedia Foundation survey in 2008 showed that only 13 percent of Wikipedia editors were female.[133] Because of this, universities throughout the United States tried to encourage women to become Wikipedia contributors. Similarly, many of these universities, including Yale and Brown, gave college credit to students who create or edit an article relating to women in science or technology.[134]Andrew Lih, a professor and scientist, wrote in The New York Times that the reason he thought the number of male contributors outnumbered the number of females so greatly was because identifying as a woman may expose oneself to "ugly, intimidating behavior".[135] Data has shown that Africans are underrepresented among Wikipedia editors.[136]

Language editions

Main article: List of Wikipedias

Most popular edition of Wikipedia by country in January 2021.
Most viewed editions of Wikipedia over time.
Most edited editions of Wikipedia over time.

There are currently 325 language editions of Wikipedia (also called language versions, or simply Wikipedias). As of November 2021, the six largest, in order of article count, are the English, Cebuano, Swedish, German, French, and Dutch Wikipedias.[138] The second and third-largest Wikipedias owe their position to the article-creating botLsjbot, which as of 2013[update] had created about half the articles on the Swedish Wikipedia, and most of the articles in the Cebuano and Waray Wikipedias. The latter are both languages of the Philippines.

In addition to the top six, twelve other Wikipedias have more than a million articles each (Russian, Spanish, Italian, Polish, Egyptian Arabic, Japanese, Vietnamese, Waray, Chinese, Arabic, Ukrainian and Portuguese), seven more have over 500,000 articles (Persian, Catalan, Serbian, Indonesian, Norwegian, Korean and Finnish), 44 more have over 100,000, and 82 more have over 10,000.[139][138] The largest, the English Wikipedia, has over 6.4 million articles. As of January 2021,[update] the English Wikipedia receives 48% of Wikipedia's cumulative traffic, with the remaining split among the other languages. The top 10 editions represent approximately 85% of the total traffic.[140]

0.1 0.3 1 3

English 6,410,000

Cebuano 6,061,269

Swedish 2,875,133

German 2,633,307

French 2,374,875

Dutch 2,071,599

Russian 1,771,271

Spanish 1,731,740

Italian 1,726,497

Polish 1,496,868

Egyptian Arabic 1,376,598

Japanese 1,300,979

Vietnamese 1,270,091

Waray 1,265,576

Chinese 1,241,531

Arabic 1,143,365

Ukrainian 1,123,197

Portuguese 1,077,389

Persian 846,650

Catalan 689,772

The unit for the numbers in bars is articles.

Since Wikipedia is based on the Web and therefore worldwide, contributors to the same language edition may use different dialects or may come from different countries (as is the case for the English edition). These differences may lead to some conflicts over spelling differences (e.g. colour versus color)[142] or points of view.[143]

Though the various language editions are held to global policies such as "neutral point of view", they diverge on some points of policy and practice, most notably on whether images that are not licensed freely may be used under a claim of fair use.[144][145][146]

Jimmy Wales has described Wikipedia as "an effort to create and distribute a free encyclopedia of the highest possible quality to every single person on the planet in their own language".[147] Though each language edition functions more or less independently, some efforts are made to supervise them all. They are coordinated in part by Meta-Wiki, the Wikimedia Foundation's wiki devoted to maintaining all its projects (Wikipedia and others).[148] For instance, Meta-Wiki provides important statistics on all language editions of Wikipedia,[149] and it maintains a list of articles every Wikipedia should have.[150] The list concerns basic content by subject: biography, history, geography, society, culture, science, technology, and mathematics. It is not rare for articles strongly related to a particular language not to have counterparts in another edition. For example, articles about small towns in the United States might be available only in English, even when they meet the notability criteria of other language Wikipedia projects.

Estimation of contributions shares from different regions in the world to different Wikipedia editions[151]

Translated articles represent only a small portion of articles in most editions, in part because those editions do not allow fully automated translation of articles. Articles available in more than one language may offer "interwiki links", which link to the counterpart articles in other editions.[citation needed]

A study published by PLOS One in 2012 also estimated the share of contributions to different editions of Wikipedia from different regions of the world. It reported that the proportion of the edits made from North America was 51% for the English Wikipedia, and 25% for the simple English Wikipedia.[151]

English Wikipedia editor numbers

Number of editors on the English Wikipedia over time.

On March 1, 2014, The Economist, in an article titled "The Future of Wikipedia", cited a trend analysis concerning data published by the Wikimedia Foundation stating that "[t]he number of editors for the English-language version has fallen by a third in seven years."[152] The attrition rate for active editors in English Wikipedia was cited by The Economist as substantially in contrast to statistics for Wikipedia in other languages (non-English Wikipedia). The Economist reported that the number of contributors with an average of five or more edits per month was relatively constant since 2008 for Wikipedia in other languages at approximately 42,000 editors within narrow seasonal variances of about 2,000 editors up or down. The number of active editors in English Wikipedia, by sharp comparison, was cited as peaking in 2007 at approximately 50,000 and dropping to 30,000 by the start of 2014.

In contrast, the trend analysis published in The Economist presents Wikipedia in other languages (non-English Wikipedia) as successful in retaining their active editors on a renewable and sustained basis, with their numbers remaining relatively constant at approximately 42,000.[152] No comment was made concerning which of the differentiated edit policy standards from Wikipedia in other languages (non-English Wikipedia) would provide a possible alternative to English Wikipedia for effectively ameliorating substantial editor attrition rates on the English-language Wikipedia.[153]

Reception

See also: Academic studies about Wikipedia and Criticism of Wikipedia

Ambox current red.svg

This section needs to be updated. Please help update this article to reflect recent events or newly available information.(March 2018)

Various Wikipedians have criticized Wikipedia's large and growing regulation, which includes more than fifty policies and nearly 150,000 words as of 2014.[update][154][155]

Critics have stated that Wikipedia exhibits systemic bias. In 2010, columnist and journalist Edwin Black described Wikipedia as being a mixture of "truth, half-truth, and some falsehoods".[156] Articles in The Chronicle of Higher Education and The Journal of Academic Librarianship have criticized Wikipedia's "Undue Weight" policy, concluding that the fact that Wikipedia explicitly is not designed to provide correct information about a subject, but rather focus on all the major viewpoints on the subject, give less attention to minor ones, and creates omissions that can lead to false beliefs based on incomplete information.[157][158][159]

Journalists Oliver Kamm and Edwin Black alleged (in 2010 and 2011 respectively) that articles are dominated by the loudest and most persistent voices, usually by a group with an "ax to grind" on the topic.[156][160] A 2008 article in Education Next Journal concluded that as a resource about controversial topics, Wikipedia is subject to manipulation and spin.[161]

In 2020, Omer Benjakob and Stephen Harrison noted that "Media coverage of Wikipedia has radically shifted over the past two decades: once cast as an intellectual frivolity, it is now lauded as the 'last bastion of shared reality' online."[162]

In 2006, the Wikipedia Watch criticism website listed dozens of examples of plagiarism in the English Wikipedia.[163]

Accuracy of content

Main article: Reliability of Wikipedia

Articles for traditional encyclopedias such as Encyclopædia Britannica are written by experts, lending such encyclopedias a reputation for accuracy.[164] However, a peer review in 2005 of forty-two scientific entries on both Wikipedia and Encyclopædia Britannica by the science journal Nature found few differences in accuracy, and concluded that "the average science entry in Wikipedia contained around four inaccuracies; Britannica, about three."[165] Joseph Reagle suggested that while the study reflects "a topical strength of Wikipedia contributors" in science articles, "Wikipedia may not have fared so well using a random sampling of articles or on humanities subjects."[166] Others raised similar critiques.[167] The findings by Nature were disputed by Encyclopædia Britannica,[168][169] and in response, Nature gave a rebuttal of the points raised by Britannica.[170] In addition to the point-for-point disagreement between these two parties, others have examined the sample size and selection method used in the Nature effort, and suggested a "flawed study design" (in Nature's manual selection of articles, in part or in whole, for comparison), absence of statistical analysis (e.g., of reported confidence intervals), and a lack of study "statistical power" (i.e., owing to small sample size, 42 or 4 × 101 articles compared, vs >105 and >106 set sizes for Britannica and the English Wikipedia, respectively).[171]

As a consequence of the open structure, Wikipedia "makes no guarantee of validity" of its content, since no one is ultimately responsible for any claims appearing in it.[172] Concerns have been raised by PC World in 2009 regarding the lack of accountability that results from users' anonymity,[173] the insertion of false information,[174]vandalism, and similar problems.

Economist Tyler Cowen wrote: "If I had to guess whether Wikipedia or the median refereed journal article on economics was more likely to be true after a not so long think I would opt for Wikipedia." He comments that some traditional sources of non-fiction suffer from systemic biases, and novel results, in his opinion, are over-reported in journal articles as well as relevant information being omitted from news reports. However, he also cautions that errors are frequently found on Internet sites and that academics and experts must be vigilant in correcting them.[175]Amy Bruckman has argued that, due to the number of reviewers, "the content of a popular Wikipedia page is actually the most reliable form of information ever created".[176]

Critics argue that Wikipedia's open nature and a lack of proper sources for most of the information makes it unreliable.[177] Some commentators suggest that Wikipedia may be reliable, but that the reliability of any given article is not clear.[178] Editors of traditional reference works such as the Encyclopædia Britannica have questioned the project's utility and status as an encyclopedia.[179] Wikipedia co-founder Jimmy Wales has claimed that Wikipedia has largely avoided the problem of "fake news" because the Wikipedia community regularly debates the quality of sources in articles.[180]

Wikipedia's open structure inherently makes it an easy target for Internet trolls, spammers, and various forms of paid advocacy seen as counterproductive to the maintenance of a neutral and verifiable online encyclopedia.[80][182] In response to paid advocacy editing and undisclosed editing issues, Wikipedia was reported in an article in The Wall Street Journal, to have strengthened its rules and laws against undisclosed editing.[183] The article stated that: "Beginning Monday [from the date of the article, June 16, 2014], changes in Wikipedia's terms of use will require anyone paid to edit articles to disclose that arrangement. Katherine Maher, the nonprofit Wikimedia Foundation's chief communications officer, said the changes address a sentiment among volunteer editors that, 'we're not an advertising service; we're an encyclopedia.'"[183][184][185][186][187] These issues, among others, had been parodied since the first decade of Wikipedia, notably by Stephen Colbert on The Colbert Report.[188]

A Harvard law textbook, Legal Research in a Nutshell (2011), cites Wikipedia as a "general source" that "can be a real boon" in "coming up to speed in the law governing a situation" and, "while not authoritative, can provide basic facts as well as leads to more in-depth resources".[189]

Discouragement in education

Ambox current red.svg

This section needs to be updated. Please help update this article to reflect recent events or newly available information.(December 2020)

Most university lecturers discourage students from citing any encyclopedia in academic work, preferring primary sources;[190] some specifically prohibit Wikipedia citations. Wales stresses that encyclopedias of any type are not usually appropriate to use as citable sources, and should not be relied upon as authoritative.[193] Wales once (2006 or earlier) said he receives about ten emails weekly from students saying they got failing grades on papers because they cited Wikipedia; he told the students they got what they deserved. "For God's sake, you're in college; don't cite the encyclopedia," he said.[194]

In February 2007, an article in The Harvard Crimson newspaper reported that a few of the professors at Harvard University were including Wikipedia articles in their syllabi, although without realizing the articles might change.[195] In June 2007, former president of the American Library AssociationMichael Gorman condemned Wikipedia, along with Google,[196] stating that academics who endorse the use of Wikipedia are "the intellectual equivalent of a dietitian who recommends a steady diet of Big Macs with everything".

In contrast, academic writing[clarification needed] in Wikipedia has evolved in recent years and has been found to increase student interest, personal connection to the product, creativity in material processing, and international collaboration in the learning process.[197]

Medical information

See also: Health information on Wikipedia

On March 5, 2014, Julie Beck writing for The Atlantic magazine in an article titled "Doctors' #1 Source for Healthcare Information: Wikipedia", stated that "Fifty percent of physicians look up conditions on the (Wikipedia) site, and some are editing articles themselves to improve the quality of available information."[198] Beck continued to detail in this article new programs of Amin Azzam at the University of San Francisco to offer medical school courses to medical students for learning to edit and improve Wikipedia articles on health-related issues, as well as internal quality control programs within Wikipedia organized by James Heilman to improve a group of 200 health-related articles of central medical importance up to Wikipedia's highest standard of articles using its Featured Article and Good Article peer-review evaluation process.[198] In a May 7, 2014, follow-up article in The Atlantic titled "Can Wikipedia Ever Be a Definitive Medical Text?", Julie Beck quotes WikiProject Medicine's James Heilman as stating: "Just because a reference is peer-reviewed doesn't mean it's a high-quality reference."[199] Beck added that: "Wikipedia has its own peer review process before articles can be classified as 'good' or 'featured'. Heilman, who has participated in that process before, says 'less than one percent' of Wikipedia's medical articles have passed."[199]

Quality of writing

Screenshot of English Wikipedia's article on Earth, a featured-class article

In a 2006 mention of Jimmy Wales, Time magazine stated that the policy of allowing anyone to edit had made Wikipedia the "biggest (and perhaps best) encyclopedia in the world".[200]

In 2008, researchers at Carnegie Mellon University found that the quality of a Wikipedia article would suffer rather than gain from adding more writers when the article lacked appropriate explicit or implicit coordination.[201] For instance, when contributors rewrite small portions of an entry rather than making full-length revisions, high- and low-quality content may be intermingled within an entry. Roy Rosenzweig, a history professor, stated that American National Biography Online outperformed Wikipedia in terms of its "clear and engaging prose", which, he said, was an important aspect of good historical writing.[202] Contrasting Wikipedia's treatment of Abraham Lincoln to that of Civil War historian James McPherson in American National Biography Online, he said that both were essentially accurate and covered the major episodes in Lincoln's life, but praised "McPherson's richer contextualization ... his artful use of quotations to capture Lincoln's voice ... and ... his ability to convey a profound message in a handful of words." By contrast, he gives an example of Wikipedia's prose that he finds "both verbose and dull". Rosenzweig also criticized the "waffling—encouraged by the NPOV policy—[which] means that it is hard to discern any overall interpretive stance in Wikipedia history". While generally praising the article on William Clarke Quantrill, he quoted its conclusion as an example of such "waffling", which then stated: "Some historians ... remember him as an opportunistic, bloodthirsty outlaw, while others continue to view him as a daring soldier and local folk hero."[202]

Other critics have made similar charges that, even if Wikipedia articles are factually accurate, they are often written in a poor, almost unreadable style. Frequent Wikipedia critic Andrew Orlowski commented, "Even when a Wikipedia entry is 100 percent factually correct, and those facts have been carefully chosen, it all too often reads as if it has been translated from one language to another then into a third, passing an illiterate translator at each stage."[203] A study of Wikipedia articles on cancer was conducted in 2010 by Yaacov Lawrence of the Kimmel Cancer Center at Thomas Jefferson University. The study was limited to those articles that could be found in the Physician Data Query and excluded those written at the "start" class or "stub" class level. Lawrence found the articles accurate but not very readable, and thought that "Wikipedia's lack of readability (to non-college readers) may reflect its varied origins and haphazard editing".[204]The Economist argued that better-written articles tend to be more reliable: "inelegant or ranting prose usually reflects muddled thoughts and incomplete information".[205]

Coverage of topics and systemic bias

See also: Notability in the English Wikipedia and Criticism of Wikipedia § Systemic bias in coverage

Ambox current red.svg

Parts of this article (those related to d:Wikidata:Statistics/Wikipedia) need to be updated. Please help update this article to reflect recent events or newly available information.(March 2017)

Wikipedia seeks to create a summary of all human knowledge in the form of an online encyclopedia, with each topic covered encyclopedically in one article. Since it has terabytes of disk space, it can have far more topics than can be covered by any printed encyclopedia.[206] The exact degree and manner of coverage on Wikipedia is under constant review by its editors, and disagreements are not uncommon (see deletionism and inclusionism).[207][208] Wikipedia contains materials that some people may find objectionable, offensive, or pornographic. The "Wikipedia is not censored" policy has sometimes proved controversial: in 2008, Wikipedia rejected an online petition against the inclusion of images of Muhammad in the English edition of its Muhammad article, citing this policy. The presence of politically, religiously, and pornographically sensitive materials in Wikipedia has led to the censorship of Wikipedia by national authorities in China[209] and Pakistan,[210] amongst other countries.

A 2008 study conducted by researchers at Carnegie Mellon University and Palo Alto Research Center gave a distribution of topics as well as growth (from July 2006 to January 2008) in each field:[211]

  • Culture and Arts: 30% (210%)
  • Biographies and persons: 15% (97%)
  • Geography and places: 14% (52%)
  • Society and social sciences: 12% (83%)
  • History and events: 11% (143%)
  • Natural and Physical Sciences: 9% (213%)
  • Technology and Applied Science: 4% (−6%)
  • Religions and belief systems: 2% (38%)
  • Health: 2% (42%)
  • Mathematics and logic: 1% (146%)
  • Thought and Philosophy: 1% (160%)

These numbers refer only to the number of articles: it is possible for one topic to contain a large number of short articles and another to contain a small number of large ones. Through its "Wikipedia Loves Libraries" program, Wikipedia has partnered with major public libraries such as the New York Public Library for the Performing Arts to expand its coverage of underrepresented subjects and articles.[212]

A 2011 study conducted by researchers at the University of Minnesota indicated that male and female editors focus on different coverage topics. There was a greater concentration of females in the "people and arts" category, while males focus more on "geography and science".[213]

Coverage of topics and selection bias

Research conducted by Mark Graham of the Oxford Internet Institute in 2009 indicated that the geographic distribution of article topics is highly uneven. Africa is the most underrepresented.[214] Across 30 language editions of Wikipedia, historical articles and sections are generally Eurocentric and focused on recent events.[215]

An editorial in The Guardian in 2014 claimed that more effort went into providing references for a list of female porn actors than a list of women writers.[216] Data has also shown that Africa-related material often faces omission; a knowledge gap that a July 2018 Wikimedia conference in Cape Town sought to address.[136]

Systemic biases

When multiple editors contribute to one topic or set of topics, systemic bias may arise, due to the demographic backgrounds of the editors. In 2011, Wales claimed that the unevenness of coverage is a reflection of the demography of the editors, citing for example "biographies of famous women through history and issues surrounding early childcare".[48] The October 22, 2013, essay by Tom Simonite in MIT's Technology Review titled "The Decline of Wikipedia" discussed the effect of systemic bias and policy creep on the downward trend in the number of editors.[49]

Systemic bias on Wikipedia may follow that of culture generally,[vague] for example favoring certain nationalities, ethnicities or majority religions.[217] It may more specifically follow the biases of Internet culture, inclining to be young, male, English-speaking, educated, technologically aware, and wealthy enough to spare time for editing. Biases, intrinsically, may include an overemphasis on topics such as pop culture, technology, and current events.[217]

Taha Yasseri of the University of Oxford, in 2013, studied the statistical trends of systemic bias at Wikipedia introduced by editing conflicts and their resolution.[218][219] His research examined the counterproductive work behavior of edit warring. Yasseri contended that simple reverts or "undo" operations were not the most significant measure of counterproductive behavior at Wikipedia and relied instead on the statistical measurement of detecting "reverting/reverted pairs" or "mutually reverting edit pairs". Such a "mutually reverting edit pair" is defined where one editor reverts the edit of another editor who then, in sequence, returns to revert the first editor in the "mutually reverting edit pairs". The results were tabulated for several language versions of Wikipedia. The English Wikipedia's three largest conflict rates belonged to the articles George W. Bush, anarchism, and Muhammad.[219] By comparison, for the German Wikipedia, the three largest conflict rates at the time of the Oxford study were for the articles covering Croatia, Scientology, and 9/11 conspiracy theories.[219]

Researchers from Washington University developed a statistical model to measure systematic bias in the behavior of Wikipedia's users regarding controversial topics. The authors focused on behavioral changes of the encyclopedia's administrators after assuming the post, writing that systematic bias occurred after the fact.[220][221]

Explicit content

See also: Internet Watch Foundation and Wikipedia and Reporting of child pornography images on Wikimedia Commons

"Wikipedia censorship" redirects here. For the government censorship of Wikipedia, see Censorship of Wikipedia. For Wikipedia's policy concerning censorship, see Wikipedia:Wikipedia is not censored

Wikipedia has been criticized for allowing information about graphic content. Articles depicting what some critics have called objectionable content (such as feces, cadaver, human penis, vulva, and nudity) contain graphic pictures and detailed information easily available to anyone with access to the internet, including children.

The site also includes sexual content such as images and videos of masturbation and ejaculation, illustrations of zoophilia, and photos from hardcore pornographic films in its articles. It also has non-sexual photographs of nude children.

The Wikipedia article about Virgin Killer—a 1976 album from the GermanrockbandScorpions—features a picture of the album's original cover, which depicts a naked prepubescent girl. The original release cover caused controversy and was replaced in some countries. In December 2008, access to the Wikipedia article Virgin Killer was blocked for four days by most Internet service providers in the United Kingdom after the Internet Watch Foundation (IWF) decided the album cover was a potentially illegal indecent image and added the article's URL to a "blacklist" it supplies to British internet service providers.[222]

In April 2010, Sanger wrote a letter to the Federal Bureau of Investigation, outlining his concerns that two categories of images on Wikimedia Commons contained child pornography, and were in violation of US federal obscenity law.[223][224] Sanger later clarified that the images, which were related to pedophilia and one about lolicon, were not of real children, but said that they constituted "obscene visual representations of the sexual abuse of children", under the PROTECT Act of 2003.[225] That law bans photographic child pornography and cartoon images and drawings of children that are obscene under American law.[225] Sanger also expressed concerns about access to the images on Wikipedia in schools.[226]Wikimedia Foundation spokesman Jay Walsh strongly rejected Sanger's accusation,[227] saying that Wikipedia did not have "material we would deem to be illegal. If we did, we would remove it."[227] Following the complaint by Sanger, Wales deleted sexual images without consulting the community. After some editors who volunteer to maintain the site argued that the decision to delete had been made hastily, Wales voluntarily gave up some of the powers he had held up to that time as part of his co-founder status. He wrote in a message to the Wikimedia Foundation mailing-list that this action was "in the interest of encouraging this discussion to be about real philosophical/content issues, rather than be about me and how quickly I acted".[228] Critics, including Wikipediocracy, noticed that many of the pornographic images deleted from Wikipedia since 2010 have reappeared.[229]

Privacy

One privacy concern in the case of Wikipedia is the right of a private citizen to remain a "private citizen" rather than a "public figure" in the eyes of the law.[230][note 6] It is a battle between the right to be anonymous in cyberspace and the right to be anonymous in real life ("meatspace"). A particular problem occurs in the case of a relatively unimportant individual and for whom there exists a Wikipedia page against her or his wishes.

In January 2006, a German court ordered the German Wikipedia shut down within Germany because it stated the full name of Boris Floricic, aka "Tron", a deceased hacker. On February 9, 2006, the injunction against Wikimedia Deutschland was overturned, with the court rejecting the notion that Tron's right to privacy or that of his parents was being violated.[231]

Wikipedia has a "Volunteer Response Team" that uses Znuny, a free and open-source software fork of OTRS[232] to handle queries without having to reveal the identities of the involved parties. This is used, for example, in confirming the permission for using individual images and other media in the project.[233]

Sexism

Main article: Gender bias on Wikipedia

Wikipedia was described in 2015 as harboring a battleground culture of sexism and harassment.[234][235]

The perceived toxic attitudes and tolerance of violent and abusive language were reasons put forth in 2013 for the gender gap in Wikipedia editorship.[236]

Edit-a-thons have been held to encourage female editors and increase the coverage of women's topics.[237]

A comprehensive 2008 survey, published in 2016, found significant gender differences in: confidence in expertise, discomfort with editing, and response to critical feedback. "Women reported less confidence in their expertise, expressed greater discomfort with editing (which typically involves conflict), and reported more negative responses to critical feedback compared to men."[238]

Operation

Wikimedia Foundation and Wikimedia movement affiliates

Main article: Wikimedia Foundation

Wikipedia is hosted and funded by the Wikimedia Foundation, a non-profit organization which also operates Wikipedia-related projects such as Wiktionary and Wikibooks. The foundation relies on public contributions and grants to fund its mission.[239] The foundation's 2013 IRS Form 990 shows revenue of $39.7 million and expenses of almost $29 million, with assets of $37.2 million and liabilities of about $2.3 million.[240]

In May 2014, Wikimedia Foundation named Lila Tretikov as its second executive director, taking over for Sue Gardner.[241] The Wall Street Journal reported on May 1, 2014, that Tretikov's information technology background from her years at University of California offers Wikipedia an opportunity to develop in more concentrated directions guided by her often repeated position statement that, "Information, like air, wants to be free."[242][243] The same Wall Street Journal article reported these directions of development according to an interview with spokesman Jay Walsh of Wikimedia, who "said Tretikov would address that issue (paid advocacy) as a priority. 'We are really pushing toward more transparency ... We are reinforcing that paid advocacy is not welcome.' Initiatives to involve greater diversity of contributors, better mobile support of Wikipedia, new geo-location tools to find local content more easily, and more tools for users in the second and third world are also priorities," Walsh said.[242]

Following the departure of Tretikov from Wikipedia due to issues concerning the use of the "superprotection" feature which some language versions of Wikipedia have adopted, Katherine Maher became the third executive director of the Wikimedia Foundation in June 2016.[244] Maher has stated that one of her priorities would be the issue of editor harassment endemic to Wikipedia as identified by the Wikipedia board in December. Maher stated regarding the harassment issue that: "It establishes a sense within the community that this is a priority ... (and that correction requires that) it has to be more than words."[245]

Wikipedia is also supported by many organizations and groups that are affiliated with the Wikimedia Foundation but independently-run, called Wikimedia movement affiliates. These include Wikimedia chapters (which are national or sub-national organizations, such as Wikimedia Deutschland and Wikimédia France), thematic organizations (such as Amical Wikimedia for the Catalan language community), and user groups. These affiliates participate in the promotion, development, and funding of Wikipedia.

Software operations and support

See also: MediaWiki

The operation of Wikipedia depends on MediaWiki, a custom-made, free and open sourcewiki software platform written in PHP and built upon the MySQL database system.[246] The software incorporates programming features such as a macro language, variables, a transclusion system for templates, and URL redirection. MediaWiki is licensed under the GNU General Public License (GPL) and it is used by all Wikimedia projects, as well as many other wiki projects. Originally, Wikipedia ran on UseModWiki written in Perl by Clifford Adams (Phase I), which initially required CamelCase for article hyperlinks; the present double bracket style was incorporated later. Starting in January 2002 (Phase II), Wikipedia began running on a PHP wiki engine with a MySQL database; this software was custom-made for Wikipedia by Magnus Manske. The Phase II software was repeatedly modified to accommodate the exponentially increasing demand. In July 2002 (Phase III), Wikipedia shifted to the third-generation software, MediaWiki, originally written by Lee Daniel Crocker.

Several MediaWiki extensions are installed[247] to extend the functionality of the MediaWiki software.

In April 2005, a Lucene extension[248][249] was added to MediaWiki's built-in search and Wikipedia switched from MySQL to Lucene for searching. Lucene was later replaced by CirrusSearch which is based on Elasticsearch.[250]

In July 2013, after extensive beta testing, a WYSIWYG (What You See Is What You Get) extension, VisualEditor, was opened to public use.[251][252][253][254] It was met with much rejection and criticism, and was described as "slow and buggy".[255] The feature was changed from opt-out to opt-in afterward.

Automated editing

Main article: Wikipedia bots

Computer programs called bots have often been used to perform simple and repetitive tasks, such as correcting common misspellings and stylistic issues, or to start articles such as geography entries in a standard format from statistical data.[256][257][258] One controversial contributor, Sverker Johansson, creating articles with his bot was reported to create up to 10,000 articles on the Swedish Wikipedia on certain days.[259] Additionally, there are bots designed to automatically notify editors when they make common editing errors (such as unmatched quotes or unmatched parentheses).[260] Edits falsely identified by bots as the work of a banned editor can be restored by other editors. An anti-vandal bot is programmed to detect and revert vandalism quickly.[257] Bots are able to indicate edits from particular accounts or IP address ranges, as occurred at the time of the shooting down of the MH17 jet incident in July 2014 when it was reported that edits were made via IPs controlled by the Russian government.[261] Bots on Wikipedia must be approved before activation.[262]

According to Andrew Lih, the current expansion of Wikipedia to millions of articles would be difficult to envision without the use of such bots.[263]

Hardware operations and support

See also: Wikimedia Foundation § Hardware

Wikipedia receives between 25,000 and 60,000-page requests per second, depending on the time of the day.[264][needs update] As of 2021,[update] page requests are first passed to a front-end layer of Varnish caching servers and back-end layer caching is done by Apache Traffic Server.[265]

Источник: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia

Notice: Undefined variable: z_bot in /sites/kadinca.us/2020/farming-simulator-2020-crack-keygen-code-free-download-2020.php on line 107

Notice: Undefined variable: z_empty in /sites/kadinca.us/2020/farming-simulator-2020-crack-keygen-code-free-download-2020.php on line 107

4 Replies to “Farming Simulator 2020 Crack + Keygen Code Free Download 2020”

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *